A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE TEXTUAL FEATURES OF IRANIAN AND ENGLISH RECOMMENDATION LETTERS

Elaheh Tajik Qanbari, Majid Nemati, Iman Tohidian

DOI Number
-
First page
309
Last page
319

Abstract


Analysis of different academic writings to obtain cross-cultural differences, Recommendation Letters is still considered as a Cinderella among Iranian scholars. Adopting the Clyne's (1991) framework to analyze English recommendation letters written by Iranian, American, Canadian, and British university professors, to see if there is any significant difference between these two types in terms of digression, textual symmetry, integration, advance organizers, enumerative sentences, bridge sentences, and topic sentences, forty-seven RLs were collected in total, 27 of which were written by Iranian university professors and 20 by those native speakers of English. Having analyzed the letters according to those features, a Chi2 test was conducted to demonstrate the results statistically. It was found that there are significant differences between these two groups of letters regarding textual symmetry and topic sentences, while there were no significant differences regarding digression, data integration, advance organizers, enumerative sentences, and bridge sentences.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam, C., & Artmeva, N. (2002). Writing instruction in English for academic purposes (EAP) classes: Introducing second language learning to the academic community. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom (pp. 175-94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Barton, D. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Bell, S., Cole, C.S. & Floge, L. (1992). ‘Letters of recommendation in academe: Do women and men write different languages?’, The American Sociologist, Fall, 7-22.

Bhatia, V. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.

Bloor, M. (1998). English for Specific Purposes: The preservation of the species (Some notes on a recently evolved species and on the contribution of John Swales to its preservation and protection). English for Specific Purposes, 17, 47-66.

Bouton, L. (1995). A cross-cultural analysis of structure and content of letters of reference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 211-244.

Christie, F., Martin, J. R. (1997). (Eds.) Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell.

Clyne, M. (1987). Cultural differences in the organization of academic texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 211-247.

Clyne, M. (1991). The sociocultural dimension: The dilemma of the German-speaking scholar. In H. Schroder (Ed.), Subject-oriented texts: Languages for special purposes and text theory (pp. 49-67). New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Clyne, M. (1994). Intercultural communication at work: Cultural values in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coe, R. M. & Freedman, A. (1998). Genre Theory: Australian and North American approaches. In M. Kennedy (ed.), Theorizing composition (pp.136-147). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Company.

Coe, R. M. (2002). The new rhetoric of genre: Writing political beliefs. In A.M. Johns (Ed.) Genre in the classroom (pp. 195-205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

DeLisa, J. A., Jain, S. S. & Campagnolo, D. I. (1994). 'Factors used by physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training directors to select their residents.' American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 73 (3), 152-6.

Eger, H. (1991). ‘Writer Perception, Writer Projection: The Influence of personality, Ideology and Gender on Letters of Recommendation’, unpublished dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.

Flowedew, J. (2002). ”Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach.” In A. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Mahwash: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Freedman A. & Medway., P. (1994). (Eds.) Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.

Gayed, N. M. (1991). ‘Residency directors assessments of which selection criteria best predict the performances of foreign-born medical graduates during internal medicine residencies’. Academic Medicine, 66 (11), 699-701.

Giltrow, J. (2002). “Meta-Genre.” In R. Coe, L., Lingard, & T., Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change. (pp. 187-205). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

Greenburg, A. G., Doyle, J. & McClure, D. K. (1994). ‘Letters of recommendation surgical residencies: What they say and what they mean’, Journal of Surgical Research, 56 (2), 192-8.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nded.). London: Edward Arnold.

Hatcher, L.L. (1983). ‘Letters of recommendation: Validity and contribution to variance in judgments about applicants’, unpublished dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Ohio.

Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 693-722.

Johns, A. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. New York: Cambridge UP.

Kaplan, R. B. (1995). Contrastive rhetoric. Journal of TESOL- France, 2 (2), 21-38.

Martin J. R. (1985). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Deakin University, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.

Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Martin, J. R. (1997). Analyzing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie, & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions (pp. 3-39). London: Continuum.

Miller, C. R. (1984). ‘Genre as social action.’ Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70 (2), 151–167.

Morrisett, L.N. (1935). Letters of recommendation: A study of letters of recommendation as an instrument in the selection of secondary school teachers. New York: Columbia University.

O’Halloran, B. A., Altmaier E., Smith, W. & Franken, E. (1993). ‘Evaluation of resident applicants by letters of recommendation: A comparison of traditional and behavior- based formats’. Investigative Radiology, 28, 274-7.

Precht, K. (1998). ‘A Cross-cultural Comparison of Letters of Recommendation’. English for Specific Purposes, 17 (3), 241-65.

Purves, A., & Hawisher, G. (1990). Writers, judges, and text models. In R. Beach & S. Hynds (Eds), Developing discourse practices in adolescence and adulthood (pp. 183-199).Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Renouf, A. (1987). Corpus development. In J.M. Sinclair (Ed.), Looking up (pp.1-22). London: Collins.

Swales J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J.M. (1996). “Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter.” In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 45-58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Tommaisi, G., Williams, K. & Nordstrom, C. (1998).’Letters of recommendation: What Trix and Psenka: Letters of Recommendation, 219.

Watson, C. (1987). ‘Sex-Linked Differences in Letters of Recommendation’ Women and Language, X (2), 26-8.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)