A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE TEXTUAL FEATURES OF IRANIAN AND ENGLISH RECOMMENDATION LETTERS
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adam, C., & Artmeva, N. (2002). Writing instruction in English for academic purposes (EAP) classes: Introducing second language learning to the academic community. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom (pp. 175-94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Barton, D. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bell, S., Cole, C.S. & Floge, L. (1992). ‘Letters of recommendation in academe: Do women and men write different languages?’, The American Sociologist, Fall, 7-22.
Bhatia, V. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
Bloor, M. (1998). English for Specific Purposes: The preservation of the species (Some notes on a recently evolved species and on the contribution of John Swales to its preservation and protection). English for Specific Purposes, 17, 47-66.
Bouton, L. (1995). A cross-cultural analysis of structure and content of letters of reference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 211-244.
Christie, F., Martin, J. R. (1997). (Eds.) Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell.
Clyne, M. (1987). Cultural differences in the organization of academic texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 211-247.
Clyne, M. (1991). The sociocultural dimension: The dilemma of the German-speaking scholar. In H. Schroder (Ed.), Subject-oriented texts: Languages for special purposes and text theory (pp. 49-67). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Clyne, M. (1994). Intercultural communication at work: Cultural values in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coe, R. M. & Freedman, A. (1998). Genre Theory: Australian and North American approaches. In M. Kennedy (ed.), Theorizing composition (pp.136-147). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Company.
Coe, R. M. (2002). The new rhetoric of genre: Writing political beliefs. In A.M. Johns (Ed.) Genre in the classroom (pp. 195-205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
DeLisa, J. A., Jain, S. S. & Campagnolo, D. I. (1994). 'Factors used by physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training directors to select their residents.' American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 73 (3), 152-6.
Eger, H. (1991). ‘Writer Perception, Writer Projection: The Influence of personality, Ideology and Gender on Letters of Recommendation’, unpublished dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Flowedew, J. (2002). ”Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach.” In A. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Mahwash: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Freedman A. & Medway., P. (1994). (Eds.) Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.
Gayed, N. M. (1991). ‘Residency directors assessments of which selection criteria best predict the performances of foreign-born medical graduates during internal medicine residencies’. Academic Medicine, 66 (11), 699-701.
Giltrow, J. (2002). “Meta-Genre.” In R. Coe, L., Lingard, & T., Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change. (pp. 187-205). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Greenburg, A. G., Doyle, J. & McClure, D. K. (1994). ‘Letters of recommendation surgical residencies: What they say and what they mean’, Journal of Surgical Research, 56 (2), 192-8.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nded.). London: Edward Arnold.
Hatcher, L.L. (1983). ‘Letters of recommendation: Validity and contribution to variance in judgments about applicants’, unpublished dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Ohio.
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 693-722.
Johns, A. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. New York: Cambridge UP.
Kaplan, R. B. (1995). Contrastive rhetoric. Journal of TESOL- France, 2 (2), 21-38.
Martin J. R. (1985). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Deakin University, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Martin, J. R. (1997). Analyzing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie, & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions (pp. 3-39). London: Continuum.
Miller, C. R. (1984). ‘Genre as social action.’ Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70 (2), 151–167.
Morrisett, L.N. (1935). Letters of recommendation: A study of letters of recommendation as an instrument in the selection of secondary school teachers. New York: Columbia University.
O’Halloran, B. A., Altmaier E., Smith, W. & Franken, E. (1993). ‘Evaluation of resident applicants by letters of recommendation: A comparison of traditional and behavior- based formats’. Investigative Radiology, 28, 274-7.
Precht, K. (1998). ‘A Cross-cultural Comparison of Letters of Recommendation’. English for Specific Purposes, 17 (3), 241-65.
Purves, A., & Hawisher, G. (1990). Writers, judges, and text models. In R. Beach & S. Hynds (Eds), Developing discourse practices in adolescence and adulthood (pp. 183-199).Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Renouf, A. (1987). Corpus development. In J.M. Sinclair (Ed.), Looking up (pp.1-22). London: Collins.
Swales J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J.M. (1996). “Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter.” In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 45-58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tommaisi, G., Williams, K. & Nordstrom, C. (1998).’Letters of recommendation: What Trix and Psenka: Letters of Recommendation, 219.
Watson, C. (1987). ‘Sex-Linked Differences in Letters of Recommendation’ Women and Language, X (2), 26-8.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)