ONLINE COURSE DESIGN AND MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT FOR TEACHING READING OF RESEARCH ARTICLES TO EFL UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AT A GREEK TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY

Emmanuela Vardis Seiradakis, Ioannis Spantidakis

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1802285S
First page
285
Last page
296

Abstract


Recent research findings suggest that reading research articles (RAs) enhances undergraduate engineering students’ technical knowledge and fosters their lifelong learning skills. Nevertheless, the RA genre inherently displays challenging features for novice readers, especially EFL readers. Previous works on developing materials for teaching the reading of RAs to undergraduate students are limited and mostly report on the effectiveness of interventions rather than on course design and materials development. This paper presents the design and development of online materials for a Moodle-based, English for Specific Academic Purposes course that aimed to help Greek undergraduate Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) students to learn how to read RAs within their field. The materials design was based on the theories of genre analysis, metacognition and cognitive apprenticeship. Initially, a small RA corpus consisting of thirty RAs from high-ranking ECE journals and conferences from IEEE, ACM, Elsevier and Springer was created in cooperation with the ECE faculty. Subsequently, a move analysis was performed based on a simplified coding scheme of rhetorical moves in the target genre adjusted to the needs of novice Greek EFL readers. The results from our corpus analysis were used as the foundation of the genre-based materials that aimed at fostering learners’ declarative, procedural and conditional genre knowledge and included various examples of move structures and patterns, terminology, grammar as well as weekly genre analysis reflective tasks. We then created materials that intended to provide further support so that students could convert their newly acquired genre knowledge into procedural knowledge and explicitly taught top-down RA expeditious reading strategies and conditional knowledge by including metacognitive strategy training that intended to raise their awareness of when and why they should use the taught strategies. In an attempt to further tailor the materials to the needs of our students we included audiovisual enhancements in both L1 and L2 for presentation and feedback purposes, metacognitive prompts, online dictionaries and concordancers.


Keywords

online materials, research article genre, metacognition, reading, undergraduates, engineering

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anthony,L (1999) “Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model?,” IEEE transactions on Professional Communication, vol.42(1), pp.38-46, 1999.

Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/

Bannert, M., Hildebrand, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2009). Effects of a metacognitive support device in learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 829 835.

Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2013). Scaffolding hypermedia learning through metacognitive prompts. In International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 171-186). Springer, New York, NY.

Bitran, M., Zúñiga, D., & Leiva, I. (2012). Reading Strategies used by Undergraduate Medical Students to Comprehend Scientific Publications. Medical Science Educator, 22(3), 147-150.

Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(4)

Chang, C. F., & Kuo, C. H. (2011). A corpus-based approach to online materials development for writing research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 222-234.

Cheng, A. (2008). Analyzing genre exemplars in preparation for writing: The case of an L2 graduate student in the ESP genre-based instructional framework of academic literacy. Applied linguistics, 29(1), 50-71.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.

Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American educator, 15(3), 6-11.

Cornish, M. M., & Cantor, P. A. (2008). “Thinking About Thinking: It's not Just for Philosophers:” Using Metacognitive Journals to Teach and Learn About Constructivism. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 29(4), 326-339.

Cortes, V. (2007). Genre and corpora in the English for academic writing class. Ortesol Journal, 25, 9.

Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). Using learning management systems as metacognitive tools to support self-regulation in higher education contexts. In International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 197-211). Springer, New York, NY.

Dunlap, J. C. (2006). Using guided reflective journaling activities to capture students’ changing perceptions. TechTrends, 50(6), 20-26.

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2003). Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 7-25.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906.

Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014, March). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of mooc videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 41-50). ACM.

Gulwadi, G. B. (2009). Using reflective journals in a sustainable design studio. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(2), 96–106.

Hadwin, A. F, Järvelä, S., & Miller M. (2017). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65-86). New York, NY Routledge

Han, P., Zhu, Z., & Wei, Q. (2010, December). An Analysis of Disciplinary Variation in the Structure of Research Article Introductions. In Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering (CiSE), 2010 International Conference on (pp. 1-4 IEEE.

Harper, F., Green, H., & Fernandez-Toro, M. (2015). Using screencasts in the teaching of modern languages: investigating the use of Jing® in feedback on written assignments. The Language Learning Journal, 1-18.

Harris, M. (2008). Scaffolding reflective journal writing–Negotiating power, play and position. Nurse education today, 28(3), 314-326.

Hoskins, S. G., Lopatto, D., & Stevens, L. M. (2011). The CREATE approach to primary literature shifts undergraduates’ self-assessed ability to read and analyze journal articles, attitudes about science, and epistemological beliefs. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10(4), 368-378.

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Hyon, Genre and ESL Reading, in Johns, A. M. (Ed.). (2001). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives

Hyppönen, K., & Paganuzzi, V. M. (2010). Computer science research articles: the locations of different section types, and a proposal for standardization in the structure. Scientometrics, 84(1), 199-220. Routledge, 121-129.

Iiskala, T., Volet, S., Lehtinen, E., & Vauras, M. (2015). Socially Shared Metacognitive Regulation in Asynchronous CSCL in Science: Functions, Evolution and Participation. Frontline Learning Research, 3(1), 78-111.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2012). Research article structure of research article introductions in three engineering subdisciplines. IEEE Transactions on professional communication, 55(4), 294-309.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 74-86.

Kizilcec, R. F., Papadopoulos, K., & Sritanyaratana, L. (2014, April). Showing face in video instruction: effects on information retention, visual attention, and affect. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2095-2102). ACM.

Knezek, L. A. (2015). Academic reading online: Digital reading strategies of graduate-level English language learners (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas).

Kuxhaus, L., & Corbiere, N. C. (2016). Classroom journal club: collaborative study of contemporary primary literature in the biomechanics classroom. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 138(7), 070-801.

Liou, H. C., Yang, P. C., & Chang, J. S. (2012). Language supports for journal abstract writing across disciplines. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(4), 322-335.

Marriott, P., & Teoh, L.K. (2012). Using screencasts to enhance assessment feedback: Students’ perceptions and preferences. Accounting Education, 21(6), 583-598.

Mayer RE (2001). Multimedia Learning, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer RE (2008). Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. Cogn Instr 19, 177–213.

Mayer RE, Johnson CI (2008). Revising the redundancy principle in multimedia learning. Br J Educ Psychol 100, 380–386.

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.

Maswana, S., Kanamaru, T., & Tajino, A. (2015). Move analysis of research articles across five engineering fields: What they share and what they do not. Ampersand, 2, 1-11

McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (2012). Materials and Methods in ELT. John Wiley & Sons.

Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in student academic writing: A longitudinal study of metacognitive awareness and its relation to task perception, self-regulation, and evaluation of performance. Written Communication, 29(2), 142-179.

Negretti, R. (2017). Calibrating genre: Metacognitive judgments and rhetorical effectiveness in academic writing by L2 graduate students. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 512–539.

Negretti, R., & Kuteeva, M. (2011). Fostering metacognitive genre awareness in L2 academic reading and writing: A case study of pre-service English teachers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20 (2), 95-110.

Negretti, R., & McGrath, L. (2018). Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doctoral research writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 12-31.

Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16 (2), 119–138.

Peacock, M. (2011). The structure of the methods section in research articles across eight disciplines. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 99-124.

Posteguillo, S. (1999). The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for specific purposes, 18(2), 139-160.

Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods. Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 407–430.18(2), 139-160.

Silva, M.L. (2012). Camtasia in the classroom: Student attitudes and preferences for video commentary or Microsoft Word comments during the revision process. Computers and Composition, 29(1), 1-22.

Spantidakis, I., Chatzidaki A., Kourti-Kazouli V., Varsamidou D. &Chatzipanagotidi A. (2013). Computer Assisted Language Teaching In Greek Language Education and e-learning in Diaspora:Design and Devolpment of a Web-based Environment (39-52). EDIAMME, Rethimno.

Stoller, F. L., & Robinson, M. S. (2013). Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary approach to move analysis with pedagogical aims. English for Specific Purposes, 32(1), 45-57.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Tardy, C. M. (2009). Building genre knowledge. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.

Thompson, R. & Lee, M. J. (2012). Talking with students through screencasting: Experimentations with video feedback to improve student learning. The Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy, 1 (1).

Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (2014). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. Routledge.

Van Lacum, E. B., Ossevoort, M. A., & Goedhart, M. J. (2014). A teaching strategy with a focus on argumentation to improve undergraduate students’ ability to read research articles. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(2), 253-264.

Vincelette, E. J., & Bostic, T. (2013). Show and tell: Student and instructor perceptions of screencast assessment. Assessing Writing, 18(4), 257-277.

Vivian, R., Falkner, K., & Falkner, N. (2013, March). Building consensus: Students' cognitive and metacognitive behaviours during wiki construction. In Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE), 2013 (pp. 154-161). IEEE.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1802285S

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)