POWER, CONFUSION AND OFFENCE: A SMALL-SCALE SYSTEMIC-FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF EMAIL COMMUNICATION IN ENGLISH WITH SELECTED GERMAN COMPANIES
Abstract
The advent of increasing job mobility and globalisation, along with pragmatic group language policy, has created a situation in which many German multinational companies now regularly employ English-speaking teams of mixed nationality. This has serious ramifications for the efficiency of internal communicationas intercultural difficulties relating to hierarchy, appropriacy and directness compound the existing language problems. Common complaints in the corporate environment include an inability to 'read between the lines', confusion about project stage timings, responsiblities and urgency of requests, as well as bilateral accusations of rudeness and inappropriacy of tone. Email communication is a key element of corporate communication and it is also an area that is often overlooked in the ESL classroom as students favour speaking practice exercises as a better use of time. This small-scale piece of action research was aimed at exploring the complexity of the skills involved in effective email writing. By conducting Systemic Functional Linguistics analysis of a series of responses to a prompt email, I was able to illustrate the fact that competent email communication in English requires far more than grammatical accuracy and a wide range of vocabulary. In fact, some of the skills required for sensitive communication are at times better developed in students at a lower level of language proficiency.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anne Kankaanranta and Leena Louhiala-Salminen. “What language does global business speak? - The concept and development of BELF”. Iberica, (26), pp. 17-34. (Barcelona: Iberica,2013)
Coste, Daniel; North, Brian; Sheils, Joseph; Trim, John. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. (Strasbourg: Council for Cultural Co-operation Education Committee Modern Languages Division, 2001.)
Ernst von Glasersfeld “Constructivism in education”, in: Husén, Torsten and T. Neville Postlethwaite (eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Education: Research and Studies. Supplement Vol. 1 pg 162. (Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press, 1989)
Jerome Bruner. The Culture of Education. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996)
Michael Halliday. “An interpretation of the functional relationship between language and social structure”. Unpublished manuscript. / First printed in: M.A.K. Halliday Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning.pp.183–193. (London: Edward Arnold, 1978)
Peter Reason and Hilary Bradbury. ‘Introduction: Inquiry and Participation in Search of a World Worthy of Human Aspiration’, in P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds) TheHandbook of Action Research, pp. 1–14. (London: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2001)
Susanne Ehrenreich “English as a business lingua franca in a German multinational corporation: meeting the challenge”, Journal of Business Communication. Volume 47. Number.4, pp. 408–431 (Blacksburg, VA: the Association for Business Communication, 2010.)
Vipin Gupta, “Corporate response to global financial crisis: A knowledge-based model”. Global Economy Journal. Volume 11, Issue 2 Article 8, pp. 1–15 (San Bernardino: Berkely Electronic Press, 2011)
Zdzisław Wąsik. “On the biological concept of subjective significance: A link between the semiotics of nature and the semiotics of culture”, Sign Systems Studies. Volume 29. Issue 1, pp. 83–106. (Tartu, Tartu University Press, 2001)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)