EXPLORING THE EFFICACY OF CHATGPT IN ENHANCING SPECIALIZED COMMUNICATION SKILLS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING
Abstract
This research delves into the integration of ChatGPT, a cutting-edge language model, within the realm of English language education, with a specific emphasis on specialized communication. As artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) technologies gain significance in educational settings, this study contributes to the evolving knowledge base by evaluating the impact of ChatGPT on English language learners’ proficiency, particularly in specialized communication, connecting with the field of English for specific purposes (ESP). The utilization of ChatGPT introduces a dynamic and interactive dimension to language learning, enabling learners to partake in realistic conversations and receive immediate feedback. Furthermore, the study explores the adaptability of ChatGPT as a personalized learning tool, bridging the disciplines of educational technology and pedagogy. By addressing individual needs and accommodating different levels of language proficiency, it aligns with the professional cultures of educators, curriculum developers, and researchers in educational technology who seek innovative solutions for personalized learning experiences. The potential of ChatGPT to encourage autonomous learning and provide a supportive environment for language practice is a key point of interest in this research. Employing quantitative measures to assess the success of ChatGPT training, the researchers focused on three human dimensions (cognitive – knowledge, socio-affective – relationship, and psychomotor – action) to gain an overall view of the studied phenomenon. The study specifically investigates the perceptions and evaluation of the workshop by current Generation Z students of English in specialized communication at the University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. The research utilized an online questionnaire in Google Forms, taking advantage of the digital age for efficient data collection. Preliminary findings suggest that learners who wisely use ChatGPT demonstrate enhancements in vocabulary acquisition, syntactic structure, and contextual appropriateness within specialized communication scenarios. Teachers of the English language are likely to be interested in the findings, as they assess the effectiveness of ChatGPT in enhancing language proficiency, especially in specialized communication.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
“AI Act”. Shaping Europe’s digital future. 2024. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai
“Artificial Intelligence in Education: UNESCO Advances Key Competencies for Teachers and Learners.” UNESCO. 2025. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/artificial-intelligence-education-unesco-advances-key-competencies-teachers-and-learners
“ChatGPT Used by Teachers More Than Students: New Survey.” Walton Family Foundation. 2024. Retrieved from https://www.waltonfamilyfoundation.org/chatgpt-used-by-teachers-more-than-students-new-survey-from-walton-family-foundation-finds
“Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI”. Shaping Europe’s digital future. 2019. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
“International Day of Education 2025 global event in Paris - Artificial Intelligence and education: Preserving human agency in a world of automation.” UNESCO. 2025. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/international-day-education-2025-global-event-paris-artificial-intelligence-and-educa
“UNESCO dedicates the International Day of Education 2025 to Artificial Intelligence.” UNESCO. 2025. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-dedicates-international-day-education-2025-artificial-intelligence
“UNESCO’s AI Competency Frameworks: Equipping Educators and Students for the Age of AI.” UNESCO. 2024. Retrieved from https://ai4edu.eu/2024/11/12/unescos-ai-competency-frameworks-equipping-educators-and-students-for-the-age-of-ai/
“UNESCO’s International Education Day 2025: Embracing the Future of Artificial Intelligence in Education.” UNESCO. 2025. Retrieved from https://news.fundsforngos.org/2025/01/22/unescos-international-education-day-2025-embracing-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-in-education/
Ali, O. – Murray, P. A. – Momin, M. – Dwivedi, Y. K. – Malik, T. 2024. “The effects of artificial intelligence applications in educational settings: Challenges and strategies.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 199, 123076. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123076
Badizadegan, D. 2019. “Design Thinking for Musicians: An Introduction.” Retrieved from https://medium.com/swlh/design-thinking-for-musicians-an-introduction-fe8451f6b8fe
Blodgett, S. – Madaio, M. 2021. “Risks of AI Foundation Models in Education.” ArXiv. Retrieved from 10.48550/arXiv.2110.10024
Bohušová, Z. 2017. “The cognition of interpreting and neutralization.” Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki = Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 13, No. 4, Tambov: Rossijskaja associacija lingvistov-kognitologov. 2017.
Brooks, C. 2022. “Incorporating Design Thinking in the Study of Literature.” Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/article/incorporating-design-thinking-study-literature/
Carr, L. T. “The strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research: What method for nursing?” Journal of advanced nursing, Vol. 20/4, pp. 716 – 721. 1994. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20040716.x
Castro, F. et al. “A Methodology for Conducting Integrative Mixed Methods Research and Data Analyses” Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 342 – 360. 2010. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/155868981038291
Chmelíková, G. – Hurajová, Ľ. 2019. “ESP teachers in the world of globalisation and higher education internationalisation.” The journal of teaching English for specific and academic purposes, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 443 – 452. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1904443C
Creely, E. 2023. “The possibilities, limitations, and dangers of generative AI in language learning and literacy practices.” Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375558249_The_possibilities_limitations_and_dangers_of_generative_AI_in_language_learning_and_literacy_practices
Dančišinová, L. – Kozárová, I. 2021. “Globalizácia, kultúra, interkultúrna komunikácia a kultúrna inteligencia vo vzájomných súvislostiach: dosahy pre interkultúrny manažment. Prešov: Vydavateľstvo prešovskej univerzity.” Prešov: Vydavateľstvo prešovskej univerzity. 2021.
Dančišinová, L. 2022. “Culture c Intercultural Communication: ESP & Academic Discourse.” Prešov: Vydavateľstvo prešovskej univerzity. 2022.
Denscombe, M. “The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research”. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill, 2010.
Generale, C., et al. 2025. “Meta Artificial Intelligence Literacy of University Students: A Comparative Analysis.” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1 – 10. Retrieved from doi:10.70847/588571
Gerlich, M. 2025. “AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking.” Societies, Vo. 15, No. 1, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Hassan, B. 2024. “AI in Higher Education: Balancing Pedagogical Benefits and Ethical Challenges.” Science Step Journal, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 1 – 22. Retrieved from 10.6084/m9.figshare.26349289
Henderson, A. 2023. “7 characteristics of Gen Z in 2023.” GWI. Retrieved from https://blog.gwi.com/marketing/generation-z-characteristics/
Henriksen, D. – Richardson, C. – Mehta, R. 2017. “Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice.” Thinking Skills and Creativity, Vol. 26, pp.140 –153. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001
Horowitz, E. 2016. “What is Design Thinking anyways?” Retrieved from https://medium.com/wharton-innovation-design/what-is-design-thinking-anyways-c59428031331
Huang, L. 2023. “Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Student Privacy and Data Protection.” Science Insights Education Frontiers, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 2577 – 2587. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.23.re202
Hurajová, Ľ. – Chmelíková, G. – Luprichová, J. 2022. “Teachers’ interdisciplinary cooperation triggers students’ transferable competencies and intensifies the process of internationalisation of Higher Education.” 20th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA). Starý Smokovec: Slovakia. pp. 243 – 249. Retrieved from 10.1109/ICETA57911.2022.9974622
Ismail, I. – Aloshi, J. 2025. “Data Privacy in AI- Driven Education: An In-Depth Exploration Into the Data Privacy Concerns and Potential Solutions.” AI Applications and Strategies in Teacher Education. Retrieved from 10.4018/979-8-3693-5443-8.ch008
Javorčíková, J. – Badinská, M. “Reading and Critical Thinking Skills of Undergraduate Students: A Quantitative Analysis”. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 655 – 666. Niš: University of Niš. 2021. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2104655J
Johnston, J. “Democratizing education: Harnessing AI to break down financial barriers in higher ed”. 2024. Retrieved from https://www.ecampusnews.com/teaching-learning/2024/04/25/harnessing-ai-financial-barriers-higher-ed/
Luprichová, J. – Hurajová, Ľ. – Kováčiková, E. 2020. “CLIL – Obsahovo a jazykovo integrované vyučovanie na základných a stredných školách.” Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre.
Ngo, T. N. – Hastie, D. 2024. “Artificial Intelligence for Academic Purposes (AIAP): Integrating AI literacy into an EAP module.” English for Specific Purposes, Vol. 77, pp. 20 – 38. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.09.001
Oliveira, S. 2024. O Potencial da Inteligencia Artificial na Aprendizagem Educativa. Revista ft. 28. 40-41. 10.69849/revistaft/ma10202410161040.
Ondrejkovič, P. “Úvod do metodológie spoločenskovedného výskumu”. Bratislava: Veda, 2007.
Papadopoulos, D. 2024. “Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence in Education: The Critical Role of the Educational Community and the Necessity of Building a Holistic Pedagogical Framework for the Use of HCAI in Education Sector.” Open Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 45 – 56. Retrieved from https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/openjournal/article/view/36612
Patel, H. – Joseph, J. M. “Questionnaire Designing Process: A Review” Journal of clinical trials, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1 – 7. 2016. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0870.1000255
Pecníková, J. “Digital Identity in the Reflections of Cultural Values”. Buduščee v nastojaščem: čelovečeskoje izmerenije cifrovoj epochi. Moskva: NIU, 2018.
Plattner, H. – Meinel, Ch, – Leiffel, L. “Design Thinking. Understand – Improve – Apply”. Heidelberg: Springer, 2011.
Pondelíková, I. “Blended Education for University of 21st Century”. Trnava: University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. 2023a.
Pondelíková, I. “Design Thinking As A “Good Practice” of x-learning” Edulearn22 : 14th annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Palma de Mallorca, 4th – 6th of July, 2022. Barcelona: IATED, 2022. Retrieved from doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2022
Pondelíková, I. “Design Thinking for Specific Purposes: Comparative Study of Design Thinking Technique to Enhance Educational Process for Students of English and Teachers of Various Academic Fields”. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, Vol. 11, No. 3, Niš: University of Niš. 2023b. pp. 633 – 655. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP230813049P
Pondelíková, I. 2020. “Úvod do medzinárodných kultúrnych vzťahov a interkultúrnej komunikácie.” Banská Bystrica: Dali-BB. 2020.
Robins, P. 2018. “From Design Thinking to Art Thinking with an Open Innovation Perspective – A Case Study of How Art Thinking Rescued a Cultural Institution in Dublin.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Vol. 4, No. 4, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc4040057
Šeben Zaťková, T. 2022. “Vyučovanie so štýlom na vysokej škole.” Trnava: Univerzita Sv. Cyrila a Metoda v Trnave. 2022.
Sinkus, T. – Ozola, I. 2024. “Engineering Student Perceptions of AI Technology Implementation in ESP.” Engineering for rural Development, Vol. 23, Jelgava, Latvia. pp. 390 – 395. ISSN 1691-5976. Retrieved from https://www.iitf.lbtu.lv/conference/proceedings2024/
Sirotová, M. 2022. “Efektívne učenie vo vysokoškolskej edukácii.” Trnava: Univerzita Sv. Cyrila a Metoda v Trnave.
Sperling, R. 2022. “Design Thinking in the Second Language Classroom.” CASLT. Retrieved from https://www.caslt.org/en/blog-design-thinking/
Stahl, B. C. et al. 2022. “Organisational responses to the ethical issues of artificial intelligence.” AI & Society, Vol. 37, pp. 23 – 37. 2022. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01148-6
Welnitzová, K. 2023. “Chybovosť strojového prekladu.” Praha: Verbum.
Zaghlool, Z. D. – Khasawneh, M. A. S. 2023. “Incorporating the Impacts and Limitations of AI-Driven Feedback, Evaluation, and Real-Time Conversation Tools in Foreign Language Learning”. Migration Letters, Vol. 20, No. 7, pp. 1071 – 83. Retrieved from doi:10.59670/ml.v20i7.4863
Zhang, Z. 2024. “Advancements and challenges in AI-driven language technologies: From natural language processing to language acquisition.” Applied and Computational Engineering. Vol. 57, pp. 146 – 152. Retrieved from 10.54254/2755-2721/57/20241325
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP250125003P
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)