DISCIPLINARY SPECIFICITY IN ACADEMIC WRITING: IMPLICATIONS FOR ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES INSTRUCTION

Sonia Sharmin

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP250109010S
First page
119
Last page
129

Abstract


We examine the specificity of academic writing genres, focusing on university-level assignments in Physics and English. Through an analysis of genre conventions and expectations, this study investigates how assignment types, structural formats, and language use align with distinct epistemological frameworks in each discipline. In Physics, writing genres such as lab reports and research proposals prioritize precision, objectivity, and empirical rigor. Conversely, English assignments, including analytical essays and reflective discourses, emphasize argumentative structure, critical interpretation, and expressive language. These findings highlight the importance of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) programs in providing both discipline-specific instruction and foundational skills. By addressing the unique and shared aspects of disciplinary writing, this paper offers insights for EAP curriculum design, promoting a balance between specialized training and adaptable competencies to support students across academic fields.

Keywords

disciplinary specificity, English for Academic Purposes (EAP), genre analysis, academic writing instruction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bartholomae, David. "Inventing the University." In Writing on the Margins: Essays on Composition and Teaching, 60–85. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

Basturkmen, Helen. Developing Courses in English for Specific Purposes. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

Bazerman, Charles, ed. Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2008.

Bazerman, Charles, Chris Dean, Jessica Early, Karen J. Lunsford, Suzie Null, Paul M. Rogers, and Amanda Stansell. International Advances in Writing Research: Cultures, Places, Measures. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse/Parlor Press, 2012.

Bryson, John M. Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ:Wiley, 2024.

Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp. Digital Humanities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.

Charles, Maggie, Diane Pecorari, and Susan Hunston. eds. Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse. London: Continuum, 2009.

Coffin, Caroline, Mary Jane Curry, Sharon Goodman, Ann Hewings, Theresa M. Lillis, and Joan Swann. Teaching Academic Writing: A Toolkit for Higher Education. London: Routledge, 2003.

Emerson, Robert M., Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.

Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. New York: New York University Press, 2011.

Flowerdew, John. "Discourse Community, Legitimate Peripheral Participation, and the Nonnative-English-Speaking Scholar." TESOL Quarterly 34, no. 1 (2000): 127–150.

Flowerdew, John, and Tracey Costley. Discipline-Specific Writing: Theory into Practice. London: Routledge, 2016.

Geisler, Cheryl. Academic Literacy and the Nature of Expertise: Reading, Writing, and Knowing in Academic Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2013.

Gurevitch, Jessica, Julia Koricheva, Shinichi Nakagawa, and Gavin Stewart. "Meta-Analysis and the Science of Research Synthesis." Nature 555, no. 7695 (2018): 175–82.

Hyland, Ken, and Feng Kong Jiang. "Genre Pedagogies in Higher Education: Theoretical Insights and Practical Applications." Journal of English for Academic Purposes 51 (2021): 100972.

Kitchin, Rob. The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. London: SAGE Publications, 2014.

Lea, Mary R., and Brian V. Street. "The 'Academic Literacies' Model: Theory and Applications." Theory into Practice 45, no. 4 (2006): 368–77.

Lillis, Theresa M., and Mary Jane Curry. Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English. London: Routledge, 2010.

Loader, Ian, and Richard Sparks. Public Criminology? London: Routledge, 2010.

Mathew, Priya, and Radhika Sankara Narayanan. "Implementing discipline-specific writing support for undergraduate students in the Omani context." Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes (2023): 447-459.

Michener, William K. "Ten Simple Rules for Creating a Good Data Management Plan." PLOS Computational Biology 11, no. 10 (2015): e1004525.

Nesi, Hilary, and Sheena Gardner. Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Paltridge, Brian, and Sue Starfield, eds. The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.

Petticrew, Mark, and Helen Roberts. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2006.

Prior, Paul. "Tracing Processes: How a Research Methodology Shapes the Study of Academic Writing." In Researching Writing, edited by Anna T. Russell, 85–100. London: Routledge, 2019.

Swales, John M., and Christine B. Feak. Academic Writing for Graduate Students. 4th ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2021.

Wingate, Ursula. Academic Literacy and Student Diversity: The Case for Inclusive Practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2015.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP250109010S

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)