FROM MANUSCRIPT TO PUBLICATION: MASTERING ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC SUCCESS

Devaki V

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP240123030V
First page
365
Last page
378

Abstract


This paper explores the pivotal role of English language mastery in the journey from manuscript creation to successful publication in academic writing. Emphasizing the significance of linguistic proficiency, the study underscores how clear and precise language contributes to effective scholarly communication and adherence to publishing guidelines. The paper delineates the impact of language proficiency on the efficient development of manuscripts, reducing the likelihood of miscommunication and enhancing engagement with reviewers and editors. Moreover, linguistic proficiency is highlighted as a catalyst for global reach, positively influencing peer perceptions, and increasing the probability of publication. Recognizing the continuous nature of professional development, the paper advocates for scholars to proactively enhance their language skills, emphasizing its crucial role in advancing academic success throughout the publication process.


Keywords

English for scholarly publication, English for academic purposes, writing manuscripts, publication

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes. 13: 47-69.

Cargill, M & O’Connor, P. (2006). Developing Chinese scientists’ skills for publishing in English: evaluating collaborating colleague workshops based on genre analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 5: 207-221.

Casanave, C. & Vandriick, S. (eds) (2003) Writing for scholarly publication. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Flowerdew, J. (1999). Problems of writing for scholarly publication in English: the case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8 (3), 243-264.

Gosden, H. (1992). Research writing and NNSs: From the editors. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(2), 123-139.

Gosden, H. (1995). Success in research article writing and revision: a social-constructionist perspective. English for Specific Purposes. 13. 37-57.

Gosden, H. (2003) Why not give us the full story? Functions of referees’ comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2: 87-101.

Hyland, K. (2000/2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman/ Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Hyland, K. (2006). English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. London, Routledge.

Hyland, F & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing. 10 (3). 185-212.

Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2005). Evaluative that constructions: signaling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language.12 (1): 39-64.

Jaffe, S. (2003) No pardon for poor English in science: written and spoken language skills are critical to careers. Scientist 17, 44.

Kubota, R. (2003). Striving for an original voice in a publication? A critical reflection. In Casanave &Vandrick (eds). 61-69.

Scully, C. & Jenkins, S. (2006) Editorial: Publishing in English for non-native speakers. Oral Oncology 42 (7): 753

St John, M. J. (1987) Writing processes of Spanish scientists publishing in English. English for Specific Purposes. 6: 113-120

Swales, J., & Feak, C. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor,




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP240123030V

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)