LEARNING BY DOING: THE BENEFITS OF ADOPTING AN ONLINE NEGOTIATION SUPPORT SYSTEM INTO AN ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES COURSE

Margaret Kersten

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP220618009K
First page
127
Last page
148

Abstract


The paper reports on the benefits of imbedding an online negotiation support system (NSS) into the experiential learning framework of an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) course. Proponents of experiential learning projects in the second/foreign language classroom emphasize the benefits of learning by doing. To test the claim, the performances of students in two advanced level EAP courses at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, were compared. One course was developed with the principles of content-based (CBI) instruction, with input primarily from academic texts; the other course also used content-based instruction but was enhanced by an experiential learning project for which the online negotiation system was adopted.  Participation in the project provided a novel learning experience for second language learners at Carleton, with counterparts from universities in three additional countries (Austria, Poland, and Taiwan) also participating. A statistical analysis of student grades showed that the students in the EAP course enhanced by the experiential learning project obtained significantly higher grades on the final assignment in comparison to the students in the “traditional” CBI course.

The paper also demonstrates that this teaching and training system enhances learning by promoting learner autonomy, critical thinking, and academic language development. Relevant aspects of the experiential learning project led to enhanced learning outcomes, supporting the claim that learning by doing benefits language acquisition. The paper proposes a new experiential learning model, applicable to ESP/EAP instruction, i.e., the sustained-content experiential learning model which can be applied to any project that emphasizes learning through direct experience. The model depicts the importance of sequencing academic content tasks that build on each other allowing learners to accumulate knowledge and language and prepare them to engage in a meaningful, authentic communication. It also illustrates the importance of using reflection as an effective learning tool that helps develop critical thinking and analysis, skills necessary for academic success.


Keywords

ESP/EAP, online negotiation support system, content-based instruction, sustained-content instruction, experiential learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blake, R. (2016). Technology and the Four Skills. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 129-142.

Brinton, D., & Snow, M. (2017). The evolving architecture of content-based instruction. In D. Brinton & M. Snow (Eds.), The content-based classroom: New perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 2-20). Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

Brown, C. L. (2007). Content-based ESL instruction and curriculum. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 11(1), 114-119.

Burke, A. (1996). Professionalism: its relevance for teachers and teacher educators in developing countries. Prospects, 26(3), 531-542.

Carrell, P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. E. (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553-573.

Constantinou, E. K., & Papadima-Sophocleous, S. (2020). The use of digital technology in ESP: Current practices and suggestions for ESP teacher education. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 017-029.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan.

Dueñas, M. (2003). A description of prototype models for content-based language instruction in higher education. BELLS, 12.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching: Oxford University Press.

Firth, A. (1995). Introduction and Overview. In A. Fith (Ed.), The discourse of negotiation: Studies of language in the workplace (pp. 30-40): Pergamon Press.

Fleming, D., & Walter, P. (2004). Linking teacher professionalism and learner autonomy through experiential learning and task design. TESL Canada Journal, 58-72.

Gocić, M. S., & Jankovic, A. (2022). Investigating learner autonomy in EFL and ESP students at the tertiary level: cross-sectional study. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 601-610.

Holtom, B. C., & Kenworthy-U'Ren, A. L. (2006). Electronic negotiation: A teaching tool for encouraging student self-reflection. Negotiation Journal, 22(3), 303-324.

Jaffee, D. (1998). Institutionalized resistance to asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(2), 21-32.

Kasper, L. F. (1997). The impact of content-based instructional programs on the academic progress of ESL students. English for specific purposes, 16(4), 309-320.

Kasper, L. F. (1999). Content-based college ESL instruction: Theoretical foundations and pedagogical applications In L. F. Kasper, M. Babbitt, R. W. Mlynarczyk, D. M. Brinton, & J. W. Rosenthal (Eds.), Content-based college ESL instruction (pp. 3-25). Mahwah, NY: Erlbaum.

Kenny, B. (1993). For more autonomy. System, 21(4), 431-442.

Knutson, S. (2003). Experiential learning in second-language classrooms. TESL Canada Journal, 52-64.

Kobl, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs: Prențiçe-Hall.

Krashen, S. (1987). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.

Legutke, M., Thomas, H. (1991). Process and experience in the language classroom: New York: Longman.

Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., Saunders, D. M., & Minton, J. W. (2003). Negotiation. Boston: MacGraw-Hill.

Mayer, J. (1982). Making Decisions: A multidisciplinary Introduction. Massachusetts Addison-Wesley.

Mayo, M. d. P. G. (2015). The interface between task-based language teaching and content-based instruction. System(54), 1-3.

Mohan, B., Slater, T., Beckett, G., Tong, E. (2015). Tasks, experiential learning and meaning making activities: a functional approach. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT: Benjamins Publishing Company.

Moon, J. A. (2013). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Routledge.

Norman, G., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557-565.

Oxford, R. L. (1993). Progress in tertiary content-based ESL instruction. TESL Canada Journal, 75-97.

Pally, M. (1997). Critical thinking in ESL: An argument for sustained content. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(3), 293-311.

Pally, M. (2000). Sustained Content Teaching in Academic ESL/EFL: A Practical Approach: Houghton Mifflin.

Poitras, J., Stimec, A., & Hill, K. (2013). Fostering student engagement in negotiation role plays. Negotiation Journal, 29(4), 439-462.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching: Cambridge University Press.

Rogers, C. R., & Freiberg, H. (1994). Freedom to Learn. New York: Pearson.

Rogers, E. M. (2001). Diffusion of Innovations: The Free Press.

Shinde, S. M., & Shinde, M. B. (2022). Effectiveness of cooperative learning techniques in teaching communication skills: ESP Learners' Perspective. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 001-012.

Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language teaching, 36(1), 1-14.

Stryker, S. B., & Leaver, B. L. (1997). Content-based instruction from theory to practice. In S. B. Stryker & B. L. Leaver (Eds.), Content-based instruction in foreign language education: Models and methods (pp. 3-28). Washington: Georgetown University Press.

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation. San Rafael, CA. Retrieved from http://www.bie.org/files//researchreviewPBL_1.pdf

Thomas, M., Reinders, H., & Warschauer, M. (2013). Contemporary computer-assisted language learning. London, UK: Bloomsbury.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology (Vol. 3): Springer.

Wilhelm, K. H. (1999). Collaborative dos and don'ts. TESOL Journal, 8(2), 14-19.

Willis, J. (2021). A framework for task-based learning: Intrinsic Books Ltd.

Willis, J., & Willis, D. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. In Challenge and change in language teaching: Heinemann Oxford.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP220618009K

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)