TELECOLLABORATIVE DEBATES IN ESP: LEARNER PERCEPTIONS AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS
Abstract
This article reports on an empirical study analyzing the development and use of effective multimodal communication strategies to deliver a telecollaborative debate as the core activity for upper-intermediate learners of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) from two far afield Spanish universities, one located in Gran Canaria and the other in Valencia. The pedagogical project not only focused on preparing and conducting an online debate through telecollaboration, but also on developing communicative skills based on discussion, argumentation, justification, critical thinking and explanation using academic and scientific language. Through a pre-task and a post-task survey, the results highlight, on the one hand, that telecollaboration is an experiential approach for ESP learners that necessarily has to involve pragmatics within a well-organized debate scenario and, on the other, that this two-way collaborative task demonstrates that telecollaborative debates are an innovative and engaging means of exploring not just content but communication and performance strategies while simultaneously helping to increase multimodal communicative fluency in the foreign language. The findings also underline the fact that elements such as motivation and self-confidence are variables that influence the learners’ performance in both conducting the necessary research to adequately debate the given topic and seeking efficient multimodal communication strategies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Altıok, S., Başer, Z., & Yükseltürk, E. (2019). Enhancing metacognitive awareness of undergraduates through using an e-educational video environment. Computers & Education, 139, 129-145.
Alvarado, J. S. (2017). The use of theater and drama techniques to foster speaking skills in the English class. Revista de Lenguas Modernas, (26), 305-317.
Anker-Hansen, J., & Andrée, M. (2015). Affordances and Constraints of Using the Socio-Political Debate for Authentic Summative Assessment. International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2577-2596.
Arnó-Macià, E., Aguilar-Pérez, M., & Tatzl, D. (2020). Engineering students' perceptions of the role of ESP courses in internationalized universities. English for Specific Purposes, 58, 58-74.
Bañados, E. (2006). A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through an online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 533-550.
Bell, B. (2007). Classroom assessment of science learning. In S. Abell, K. K. Appleton & D. L. Hanuscin (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 965-1006). New York: Routledge.
Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81.
Butler, M. G., Church, K. S., & Spencer, A. W. (2019). Do, reflect, think, apply: Experiential education in accounting. Journal of accounting education, 48, 12-21.
Cai, J. (2017). Debates around the orientation of TEFL in Chinese tertiary education. In H. Reinders, D. Numan & B. Zou (Eds.), Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. New Language Learning and Teaching Environments (pp. 115-153). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60092-9_6
Campbell, C. M., & Cabrera, A. F. (2014). Making the mark: Are grades and deep learning related? Research in Higher Education, 55(5), 494-507.
Cinganotto, L. (2019). Debate as a teaching strategy for language learning. Lingue e Linguaggi, 30, 107-125. http://doi.org/10.1285/i22390359v30p107
Castillo Losada, C. A., Insuasty, E. A., Osorio, J., & Fernanda, M. (2017). The impact of authentic materials and tasks on students' communicative competence at a Colombian language school. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 19(1), 89-104.
Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2016). Reading multimodal texts for learning–A model for cultivating multimodal literacy. Designs for Learning, 8(1), 25-36. http://doi.org/10.
/dfl.72
Dooly, M. (2017). Telecollaboration. In C. A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 169-183). John Wiley & Sons.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The Psychology of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z., & Muir, C. (2019). Creating a motivating classroom environment. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second Handbook of English Language Teaching, Springer International Handbooks of Education (pp. 1-18). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_36-1
Ellis, R. (1984). Communication strategies and the evaluation of communicative performance, ELT Journal, 38(1), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/38.1.39
Escalante Arauz, P. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in an English as a foreign language class: A proposal. Revista de Lenguas Modernas, 19, 479-485.
Fortanet-Gómez, I., & Ruiz-Madrid, N. (2016). Multimodal Humor in Plenary lectures in English and in Spanish. Multimodal Communication, 5(1), 55-69.
Fuchs, C. (2016). “Are you able to access this website at all?”–team negotiations and macro-level challenges in telecollaboration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(7), 1152-1168.
García-Sánchez, S. (2014). Knowledge Creation and Digital Collaboration in Higher Education”. In S. Rutherford (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Theory, Strategies and Educational Benefits (pp. 1-14). New York: Nova Science Publishers
García-Sánchez, S. (2016). Online metacognitive tasks for EFL distance learners. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(4), 76-90.
García-Sánchez, S. (2019). English Public Speaking: Presentations for English for Specific Purposes. The International Journal of Literacies, 26(2), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.18848/
-0136/CGP/v26i02/35-51
García-Sánchez, S. (2020). Debates in English Language Education: A Multimodal, Collaborative Ecosystem. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 10(4), 33-50.
Gimeno, A. (2018). Learner expectations and satisfaction in a US-Spain intercultural telecollaboration project. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 11(3), 5-38. http://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.776
González-Lloret, M. (2013). Technologies for performance-based assessment. In M. L. Pérez Cañado (Ed.), Competency-based Language Teaching in Higher Education (pp. 169-183). Dordrecht: Springer.
Gudkova, K. V. (2021). Developing argumentative literacy and skills in ESP students. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 9(2), 229-237. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2102229G
Haukås, Å., Bjørke, C., & Dypedahl, M. (Eds.) (2018). Metacognition in Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Routledge.
Helm, F. (2015). The practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 197-217.
Helm, F., & Guth, S. (2016). Telecollaboration and language learning. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology (pp. 241-254). London: Routledge.
Kaewpet, C. (2018). Criteria and Scale for Argumentation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(6), 564-569. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0806.02
Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with implications for Common Core State Standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223-233. https://charterschoolcenter.ed.gov/sites/
default/files/files/field_publication_attachment/223%20full_0.pdf
O'Dowd, R. (2018). From telecollaboration to virtual exchange: State-of-the-art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 1, 1-23. Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.1
O'Dowd, R., & Eberbach, K. (2004). Guides on the side? Tasks and challenges for teachers in telecollaborative projects. ReCALL, 16(1), 5-19.
Plastina, A. F. (2013). Multimodality in English for specific purposes: reconceptualizing meaning-making practices. LFE. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 19, 385-410.
Peng, J. E., Zhang, L., & Chen, Y. (2017). The mediation of multimodal affordances on willingness to communicate in the English as a foreign language classroom. Tesol Quarterly, 51(2), 302-331.
Polacsek, T. & Cholvy, L. (2011). A framework to report and to analyse a debate. Knowing the order would help to identify debaters’ attitude (pp. 1-11). Proceedings of the 2011 15th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, CSCWD, June 8-10, 2011, Lausanne, Switzerland. http://www.thomaspolacsek.net/cscwd2011.pdf
Radosavlevikj, N. (2020). Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions and Challenges in Communicative Language Teaching. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 8(3), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2003307R
Taguchi, N., & Ishihara, N. (2018). The pragmatics of English as a lingua franca: Research and pedagogy in the era of globalization. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 80-101.
Van Eemeren, F. H., & Henkemans, A. F. S. (2016). Argumentation: Analysis and evaluation. London: Routledge.
Vinagre, M. & Corral, A. (2017). Evaluative language for rapport building in virtual collaboration: An analysis of Appraisal in computer-mediated interaction. Journal of Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(3), 335-350.
Xu, J. (2018). Measuring “Spoken Collocational Competence” in Communicative Speaking Assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 255-272.
Zhang, X., & Ardasheva, Y. (2019). Sources of college EFL learners' self-efficacy in the English public speaking domain. English for Specific Purposes, 53, 47-59.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2201139G
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)