RHETORICAL ANALYSIS AT THE SERVICE OF BUSINESS COMMUNICATION: GENDER-BASED DIFFERENCES IN STUDENTS' PERCEPTION OF THE SPEAKER

Zdravka Biočina, Ivanka Rajh

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2104693B
First page
693
Last page
702

Abstract


The paper points out the benefits of rhetorical analysis and rhetorical criticism in developing business communication skills. At Zagreb School of Economics and Management, both the American and the European approach to business communication have been combined, with LSP courses taught in the first year and business communication and rhetoric courses taught in the second year. An experiment was conducted on a sample of 99 students, including 57 female and 42 male participants, who were asked to assess the teenage activist Greta Thunberg and her speech at the UN Climate Action Summit in 2019. The research focused on the role of the gender in perception of quality, attractiveness of the speech, the use of ethos, pathos and logos, persuasiveness and the influence potential. The results showed that male students gave lower grades to Greta and her speech, unlike the female students, who would also be more willing to change their behavior as the result of listening to Greta’s speech. Nevertheless, these differences were statistically significant only for a limited number of questions. The potential gender bias to speakers should be addressed in the rhetoric and business communication course design. Exposing students to a diverse set of speakers increases their critical thinking skills, ensuring higher objectivity and bias-free assessment of speakers including their peers.

Keywords

business communication, rhetorical analysis, rhetorical criticism, gender bias, student assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrews, D.C. (2009). North America: the state of the field. In: Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2009). The handbook of business discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2009). The handbook of business discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Crosling, G. and Ward, I. (2002). Oral communication: the workplace needs and uses of business graduate employees. English for Specific Purposes 21, pp. 41-57

Cerovski, A. (2020). Greta Thunberg- tko je zapravo djevojka koja je pokrenula svijet? Retrieved on June 7, 2021 from http://pressedan.unin.hr/greta-thunberg-tko-je-zapravo-djevojka-koja-je-pokrenula-svijet.html

Fan, Y., Shepherd, Lj., Slavich, E., Waters, D., Stone, M., Abel, R., et al. (2019). Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters. PLoS ONE 14(2): e0209749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209749

Feldstein, S., Dohm, F-A., Crown, C. L. (2001). Gender and Speech Rate in the Perception of Competence and Social Attractiveness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(6), pp. 785-806.

Friederike, M., Sauermann, J., and ZölitzU. (2019). Gender bias in teaching evaluations. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2), pp. 535-566.

Ilie, C.,Nickerson, C., Planken, B., (2019). Teaching Business Discourse, Switzerland:Palgrave Macmillan.

Langan, A. M., Wheater, C. P., Shaw, E. M., Haines, B. J., Cullen, W. R., Boyle, J. C., Penney, D., Oldekop, J. A., Ashcroft, C., Lockey, L., Preziosi, R. F. (2005). Peer assessment of oral presentations: effects of student gender, university affiliation and participation in the development of assessment criteria, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30:1, 21-34, DOI: 10.1080/0260293042003243878

MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., and Hunt, A. N. (2015). What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education 40, 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4

Mautner, G., and Rainer, F. (2017). Editors’ Introduction. In: Mautner, G., Rainer, F., & Ross, C. (eds). Handbook of business communication: Linguistic approaches. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 3-14.

Nickerson, C., and Planken, B. (2009). Europe: the state of the field. In: Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2009). The handbook of business discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 18-29

Ortiz, L. A., Region-Sebest, M., and MacDermott, C. (2016). Employer perceptions of oral

communication competencies most valued in new hires as a factor in company

success. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 79(3), pp. 317–330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2329490615624108.

Rajh, I. and Biočina, Z. (in press). Influence of internationalization on students’ attitudes to environmental activism. Obnovljeni život. 70 (3). https://doi.org/10.31337/oz

Sangchul, L. (2019). Integrating Rhetorical Criticism into Business Communication as an Interdisciplinary Approach, Bus. Commun. Res. Pract. 2019, 2(1), pp. 5-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22682/bcrp.2019.2.1.5

School Strike for Climate. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved on June 7, 2021 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_strike_for_climate

Sellnow, D. D. and Treinen, K. P. (2004). The role of gender in perceived speaker competence: an analysis of student peer critiques, Communication Education, 53:3,

pp. 286-296, DOI: 10.1080/0363452042000265215

Sullivan, A. O. (2011). The Importance of Effective Listening Skills: Implications for the Workplace and Dealing with Difficult People. All Theses & Dissertations. 11. Retrieved on June 1, 2021 from https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/etd/11

Turman, D. P., and Barton, H. M. (2004). Bias in the Evaluation Process: Influences of Speaker Order, Speaker Quality, and Gender on Rater Error in the Performance Based Course, Basic Communication Course Annual, Volume 16, URL: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/bcca/vol16/iss1/6 (May 7, 2021).

Zanola, A. (2016). Business Communication and Public Speaking in the ESP Domain: Some Considerations, Linguistics and Literature Studies, 4(5), pp. 331-335 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/lls.2016.040503

Wodak, R. and Benke, G. (1998). Gender as a Sociolinguistic Variable: New Perspectives on Variation Studies. In F. Coulmas, The Handbook of Sociolinguistics (Blackwell Reference Online ed.). Blackwell Publishing.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2104693B

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)