DESIGNING COMPLEX LSP TASKS FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES

Christian Krekeler

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1802225K
First page
225
Last page
233

Abstract


When integrating task-based learning into LSP courses, assessment procedures have to reflect the communicative goals of such tasks. However, performances on authentic and complex tasks are often difficult to score, because they involve not only specific language ability but also field specific knowledge. Moreover, the emphasis of tasks on meaning suggests that the communicative outcome should be regarded as the main criterion of success. This paper focuses on task design and scoring. It is argued that tasks have to be adapted to assessment purposes. However, to avoid a misalignment between teaching/learning and assessment, they should comprise the main features of LSP tasks in the sense of task-based language learning.

Keywords

LSP assessment, integrated tasks, task-based language assessment, performance assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alderson, J. Charles, and Jayanti Banerjee. 2002. “Language testing and assessment (Part 2).” Language Teaching 35 (2): 79-113.

Biggs, John Burville, and Catherine So-kum Tang. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.

Boud, David, and Nancy Falchikov. 2007. “Aligning assessment with long‐term learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (4): 399–413.

Brown, James Dean. 2002. An investigation of second language task-based performance assessments. Hawaii: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Mānoa.

Chalhoub-Deville, Micheline. 2008. “Task-based assessments: Characteristics and validity evidence.” In Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing, edited by Martin Bygate, Peter Skehan, and Merrill Swain, 210–28. Harlow: Longman.

Cohen, Elizabeth G., John I. Goodlad, Linda Darling-Hammond, and Rachel A. Lotan. 2014. Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom. 3rd ed. New York: Teachers College Press.

Davidson, Fred. 2012. “Test Specifications and Criterion Referenced Assessment.” In Davidson and Fulcher 2012, 197-207.

Davidson, Fred, and Glenn Fulcher, eds. 2012. The Routledge Handbook of Language Testing. Routledge handbooks in applied linguistics. London: Routledge.

Davies, W. Martin. 2009. “Groupwork as a form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions.” Higher Education 58 (4): 563–84.

Derwing, Tracey M., and Murray J. Munro. 2009. “Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication.” Language Teaching 42 (4): 476–90.

Douglas, Dan. 2000. Assessing Language for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, Rod. 2003. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2009. “Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19 (3): 221–46.

Fulcher, Glenn, Fred Davidson, and Jenny Kemp. 2011. “Effective rating scale development for speaking tests: Performance decision trees.” Language Testing 28 (1): 5–29.

Fulcher, Glenn. 1999. “Assessment in English for academic purposes: Putting content validity in its place.” Applied Linguistics 20 (2): 221–36.

———. 2017. “Scoring performance tests.” In The Routledge handbook of language testing, edited by Glenn Fulcher and Fred Davidson, 178–92. Abingdon, Oxon, New York: Routledge.

Harsch, Claudia, and Guido Martin. 2013. “Comparing holistic and analytic scoring methods: Issues of validity and reliability.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 20 (3): 281–307.

Knoch, Ute. 2009. “Diagnostic assessment of writing: A comparison of two rating scales.” Language Testing 26 (2): 275–304.

Norris, John M. 2016. “Current uses for task-based language assessment.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36:230–44.

Plakans, Lia. 2012. “Writing Integrated Items.” In Davidson and Fulcher 2012, 249 261.

Robinson, Peter. 2001. “Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework.” Applied Linguistics 22 (1): 27–57.

———. 2011. “Task-based language learning: A review of issues.” Language Learning 61 (Supplement s1): 1–36.

Sadler, D. Royce. 2009. “Grade integrity and the representation of academic achievement.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (7): 807–26.

Skehan, Peter. 2003. “Task-based instruction.” Language Teaching 36 (01): 1–14.

Tavakoli, Parvaneh. 2009. “Investigating task difficulty: learners' and teachers' perceptions.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19 (1).

Van den Branden, Kris. 2006. Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Weigle, Sara Cushing. 2009. Assessing Writing. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weigle, Sara Cushing, and Keisha Parker. 2012. “Source text borrowing in an integrated reading/writing assessment: Textual appropriation and source use in L2 writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 21 (2): 118–33.

Westhoff, Gerard J. 2009. “A priori assessment of language learning tasks by practitioners.” Language Teaching 42 (4): 504–18.

Wigglesworth, Gillian. 2008. “Task and performance based assessment.” In Language testing and assessment, edited by Elana Shohamy and Nancy H. Hornberger, 111–22. Encyclopedia of language and education 7. Boston, MA: Springer.

Willis, Dave, and Jane R. Willis. 2011. Doing Task-Based Teaching. 5th ed. Oxford: Open University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1802225K

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)

ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)



Publisher:

University of Niš

Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia
Phone:    +381 18 257 095
Telefax:  +381 18 257 950


© 2013 by University of Niš, Serbia