Ali Asghar Pourakbari

DOI Number
First page
Last page


Abstract: This study seeks to recognize the International English major students’ success in intercultural communicative encounters, and investigates the factors influencing it. Accordingly, the study employs the paradigm of mixed-method research, in which it comprises a qualitative phase followed by a quantitative phase, in which the design of the study draws on findings of the first phase of the study.The participants of the two studies were 30 undergraduate English major students in their third year at Khorasgan University in Isfahan, Iran, and 30 international ESL students in their first year at Gonzaga University, in Washington, U.S.A. The studies were conducted in September- December 2016. The analysis of the data includes qualitative content analysis for the first phase of the study, and descriptive statistics, correlation and regression analyses for the second phase. The results reveal that participants have diverse ideas on how to define an intercultural encounter, but they indicate similar signs of intercultural awareness in the situations they describe. Most significantly, the analysis of the narrative accounts reveals that students’ intercultural performance is greatly influenced by cognitive, affective and contextual factors. The findings of the statistical analysis indicate that the most important individual difference variables directly influencing students’ intercultural communicative competence are their communication apprehension and their perceived communicative competence.

Keywords: Communicative, Competence, Encounters, International, Intercultural, Mixed- Method Research,



Communicative, Competence, Encounters, International, Intercultural, Mixed- Method Research, Perceived

Full Text:




Belz, Julie. A. 2005. Intercultural questioning, discovery and tension in internet-mediated language learning

partnerships. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5, 3- 29.

Byram, Michael. 1997. Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual


Byram, Michael. 2008. From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship. Clevedon:

Multilingual Matters.

Callahan, Clark. (2010). Going home. Deculturation experiences in cultural reentry. Journal of Intercultural

Communication 22. Retrieved 4 January, 2011 from http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr22/callahan.htm.

Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 1968. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace & World, Inc.

Chomsky, Noam. 1975. Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon Books.

Cohen, Jacob., Cohen, Patricia., West, Stephen. G., & Aiken, Leona. S. 2003. Applied Multiple regression/

correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.), New Jersey.

Cresswell, John. W. 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Csizér, Kata., & Dörnyei, Zoltan. 2005. The internal structure of language learning motivation and its

Relationship with language choice and learning effort. Modern Language Journal, 89, 9-36.

Dörnyei, Zoltan. 2003. Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and

Processing. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dörnyei, Zoltan. 2005. The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language

acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Dörnyei, Zoltan. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dörnyei, Zoltan. & Csizér, Kata. 2005. The effects of intercultural contact and tourism on language attitudes and

language learning motivation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 24, 1-31.

Ellis, Ron. 1994. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hymes, Dell. H. 2001 [1972]. On communicative competence. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology. A

reader (55-73) Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Kramsch, Claire. 1993. Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kramsch, Claire. 1998a. Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kramsch, Claire. 2008. Language ecology in multilingual settings. Towards a theory of symbolic competence.

Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 645-671.

Kramsch, Claire. 2010. The symbolic dimension of the intercultural. Plenary delivered at the Intercultural

communication conference, University of Arizona. Manuscript of speech sent via email on 24 January, 2010.

Mackey, Alison. & Gass, Susan. 2005. Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahvah, NY:

Lawrence Erlbaum.

Nagy, Borbala. C. 2003. International students’ study abroad experience: Results of a preliminary survey. In

Andor, Jozsef, Horváth, Jozsef, & Nikolov, Marianne (Eds.), Empirical studies in English linguistics and

applied linguistics (218-250). Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport.

Samovar, Larry. A. and Porter, Richard. E. 2004. Communication between cultures (4th ed.). Belmont, CA:

Wadsworth Press.

Scarino, Angela. 2010. Assessing intercultural capability in learning languages: A renewed understanding of

language, culture, learning and the nature of assessment. The Modern Language Journal. 94(2) 324.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)

ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)


University of Niš

Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia
Phone:    +381 18 257 095
Telefax:  +381 18 257 950

© 2013 by University of Niš, Serbia