THE EFFECT OF CLASSROOM GAMES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SYNTACTIC STRUCTURES

Malavika Sharma

DOI Number
10.22190/JTESAP1704687S
First page
687
Last page
700

Abstract


Abstract. Motivating students to write is a major concern for language teachers.  It is observed that the undergraduate students of Engineering tend to ignore this skill.  With the growth of technology, the importance assigned to this skill has further weakened. Writing is limited to attempting examination questions, and evaluators assess the answers from the perspective of the acquisition of technical concepts and most often overlook the linguistic incompetence of the student.   It is obvious that as second language learners of English, technical students have very little exposure to the English language and specifically to the skill of writing.   In an attempt to develop appropriate writing strategies in students, an experiment was conducted in which tasks were designed to serve as a stimulus to generating writing in the classroom.  The tasks designed were in the form of games, role-play activities which engaged the learners’ interest and at the same time helped them to relax while learning.  This study aims to investigate the syntactic structures the students are capable of producing as a result of introducing such activities and games.  Thus, these are analyzed and categorized from Entry level to Exit level of the experiment. The method of analysis of syntactic structures adopted is based on Kellogg Hunt (1969).

Key words: classroom, games, role-play activities, syntactic structures


Keywords

classroom, games, role-play activities, syntactic structures

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ai, Haiyang, & Lu, Xiaofei. A corpus-based comparison of syntactic complexity in NNS and NS university students writing. 2013. In Nicolas Ballier, Ana Díaz-Negrillo, and Paul Thompson (Eds.), Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data (pp. 249-264). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bahrami, Farid, et.,al. A comparison of the effectiveness of game-based and traditional teaching on learning and retention of first grade math concepts. European Journal of Experimental Biology. 2 (6):2099-2102, 2012.

Beers, S. F., & Nagy, W. Syntactic Complexity as a Predictor of Adolescent Writing Quality: Which Measures? Which Genre? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 22. 185-200, 2009.

Bradford Arthur. Short-Term Changes in EFL Composition Skills. In Yorio, Carlos A., Ed.: and Others On TESOL '79: The Learner in Focus, 1979.

Coleman James Samuel, Hoffer Thomas, Kilgore Sally. High school achievement: Public, Catholic, and private schools compared. National opinion research center, 1982.

Cynthia L. Hallen, Jennifer Shakespear. The T-Unit as a Measure of Syntactic Complexity in Emily Dickinson's Poems, The Emily Dickinson Journal 11.1 91-103. 2002.

Cumming Alister. Learning to write in a Second Language: Two Decades of Research. International Journal of English Studies. Vol 1 (2), 2001, pp 1-23.

D’ Souza, Jennifer. A categorization of syntactic/rhetorical features acquired at a specific grade level, unpublished Ph. D thesis, 2015.

D’ Souza, Jennifer. Exploring the Sentence Structure at a Particular Grade Level. Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL), Vol.4.Issue 1 (January-March), 2016: 291-297.

Ellis Rod. ,& Yuan Fangyuan. The Effects of Planning on Fluency, Complexity, and Accuracy in Second Language Narrative Writing, 2004. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 26 (01). 59-84. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263104026130

Elley, W., Barham, L., Lamb, H., & Wyllie, M. The role of grammar in a secondary school English curriculum. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 10, 26-42. Reprinted in Research in the Teaching of English, 10, 5-21, 1976.

Faigley, Lester. Maturity, Complexity and Growth in College Writing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and communication (30th, Mirineapolis, Minnesota, 'April 5-7.), 1979.

Ferris, M. Roger; Politzer, Robert L. Effects of Early and Delayed Second Language Acquisition English Composition Skills of Spanish- Speaking Junior High School Students, TESOL Quarterly, v15 n3 p263-74, 1981.

Ganong, F. L. Teaching writing through the use of a program based on the work of Donald M. Murray. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University School of Education, Boston, MA. 1974.

Gauntlett, J. F. Project WRITE and its effect on the writing of high school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ. 1978.

Gee, J. P. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, 2003.

Hillocks G. Jr. The Effects of Observational Activities on Student Writing. RTE 13. 23-35. 1979.

Hillocks G. Jr.. The Interaction of Instruction, Teacher Comment, and Revision i Teaching the Composing Process. RTE 16. 261-78. 1982.

Hillocks G. Jr.. Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching. Urban III, ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and the National Conference on Research in English. 1986a.

Hudson, R. Measuring Maturity. In. R. Beard, Riley, J., Myhill, D., & Nystrand, M. SAGE Handbook of Writing Development (pp. 349-362). London: Sage. 2009.

Hunt, K. Grammatical Structures Written at three Grade Levels. NCTE. 1965.

Huyen, Nguyen and Khuat Thi Thu Nga, Learning Vocabulary through Games. The Effectiveness of Learning Vocabulary Through Games, Asian EFL Journal, Vol. 5, Issue 4, 1-15, 2003.

Ilona Leki, Alister Cumming, and Silva Tony. A Synthesis of Research in Second Language Writing in English. Routledge: NY and London. 2008.

Kam, M., Kumar, A., Shirley, J., Mathur, A., & Canny, J. Improving literacy in rural India: Cellphone games in an after-school program. Proceedings of IEEE/ACM Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Development (ICTD ’09), Doha, Qatar, April 17-19. IEEE Press Piscataway, NJ, USA, 139-149, 2009.

Kim, P., et al., A comparative analysis of a game-based mobile learning model in low-socioeconomic communities of India. Int. J. Educ. Dev., doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.05.008, 2011.

Lintunen. Pekka, Mäkilä Mari. Measuring Syntactic Complexity in Spoken and Written Learner Language: Comparing the Incomparable, Research in Language. Vol.12:4, DOI: 10.1515/rela-2015-0005. pp 377-396. 2014.

Lu, X. A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers' language development. TESOL Quarterly. 45(1). 36-62. 2011.

Lukmani, Yasmeen. The Communicational Testing of Reading. ELT Journal. 36(4). 217-225. 1982.

Max Morenberg, Donald Daiker and Andrew Kerek, Sentence combining at the College Level: An Experimental Study. In Research in the Teaching of English, published by National Council of Teachers of English, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 245-256, 1978.

Mellon, John. C. Transformational Sentence Combining- A Method for Enhancing the Development of Syntactic Fluency in English Composition, Champaign: NCTE. 1969.

Nezworski T, Stein NL, Trabasso T. Story structure versus content in children's recall, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 21: 196-206. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90561-8. 1982.

Norrby, C. & Hakansson, G. The interaction of complexity and grammatical processability: The case of Swedish as a foreign language. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 45-68. 2007.

O’ Hare Frank. Sentence – Combining: Improving Student Writing Without Formal Grammar Instruction, Research Report No. 15. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English. 1973.

Ortega, Lourdes. Syntactic Complexity Measures and their Relationship to L2 Proficiency: A Research Synthesis of College‐level L2 Writing. In Applied Linguistics 24 (4):492-518. 2003.

Prensky, Marc. Fun, Play and Games: What makes Games Engaging, Digital Game-Based Learning, McGraw Hill, Chapter 5. 2000.

Prensky, Marc. Students as Designers and Creators of Educqational Computer Games Who else? British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (6), pp. 1004-1019, 2007.

Sager, Carol. Improving the Quality of Written Composition through Pupil use of Rating scale, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English (63rd, Philadelphia, Nov. 22-24). 1973.

Shaffer, Williamson, David et.,al. Video Games and the Future of Learning, Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 87, Issue 2, pp-105-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700205, 2005.

Stockwell Glenn and Harrington Michael. The Incidental Development of L2 Proficiency in NS-NNS Email Interactions. CALICO Journal, 20 (2), p-p 337-359. 2003.

Sue Wang & Tammy Slater. Syntactic Complexity of EFL Chinese Students Writing, In English Language and Literature Studies; Vol. 6, No. 1, 2016, 81-86.

Squire, K. D. Changing the game: What happens when video games enter the classroom? Innovate, 1(6). 2005, 1-8.

Tavakoli, P. and Foster, P. Task design and second language performance: the effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning 58 (2): 439 -473. 2008.

Troyka, Lynn Quitman. Defining Basic Writing in Context. A Sourcebook for Basic Writing Teachers. Ed. Theresa Enos. New York: Random House, 2–15. Print. 1987.

Wenger, E. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1998.

Wolfe-Quintero K., S. Inagaki and H.-Y. Kim. Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. 1998.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)

ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)



Publisher:

University of Niš

Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia
Phone:    +381 18 257 095
Telefax:  +381 18 257 950


© 2013 by University of Niš, Serbia