INTERNET TECHNOLOGY AS AN AID TO TRADITIONAL METHODS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF FRESHMAN STUDENTS' USE OF ACADEMIC WORDS

Tanju Deveci

Abstract


English language preparatory programs’ focus on academic vocabulary provides university students with the threshold of lexical competence to embark on their freshman studies. However, a lack of interest in a systematic approach to increasing students’ lexical competence can result in limited academic development and cause frustration and boredom among freshman students. The problem can be magnified when instructors’ teaching styles are not geared towards the learning styles of students who often use computer technologies. This paper outlines an initiative taken to tackle this very issue in the local context of the Petroleum Institute (PI) in Abu Dhabi, UAE. It presents results from the corpus analyses conducted on texts used in one of the freshman courses at PI and from students’ writing papers, as well as students’ thoughts on the use of traditional and technology-aided teaching materials and activities. The effectiveness of the initiative is discussed, and suggestions are offered to support EAP students’ lexical competence.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brezina, V. & Gablasova, D. (2013). Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the new general service list. Applied Linguistics, 34(5). 1-23.

Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coxhead, A. J. (1998). An academic word list (English Language Institute Occasional Publication No. 18). Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington.

Deveci, T. (in press). Boredom among freshman engineering students in a communication course. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes.

Deveci, T. (2015). Communication students’ use of lexis in a writing examination. The Asian ESP Journal, 17(1), 39-63.

Deveci, T. & Simpson, A.J. (2013). Developing academic vocabulary objectives: Corpus analysis and word lists, In L. Bosworth & M.G.J. Smith (Eds.) A Practical Guide to English Language Curriculum Development in an Academic Context: Creating, Vitalizing and Evaluation (pp.77-88), Ankara: Blackswan.

Ellis, R. (2010). Explicit form-focused instruction and second language acquisition. In B. Spolsky & F. M. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 437-455). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and

practice. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hanson, S. & Padua, J. F. M. (2011). Effective Instructional Strategies Series: Teaching Vocabulary Explicitly. Hawai'i. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.

Hollingsworth, J. & Ybarra, S. (2013). Explicit direct instruction for English learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press and DataWorks Educational Research.

Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond a clockwork orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 207–223.

Hunston, S., Francis. G. & Manning, E. (1997). Grammar and vocabulary: Showing the connections. ELT Journal, 51(3), 208-216.

Hunt, A. & Beglar, D. (2002). Current research and practice in teaching vocabulary. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.) Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, (pp. 254- 266), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jones, C. Ramanau, R., Cross, S. & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university?. Computers & Education. 54, 722-732.

Jordan, D. L. & Sanchez, P. M. (1994). Traditional versus technology-aided instruction: The effects of visual stimulus in the classroom. Political Science and Politics, 26, 64-67.

Khazaei, S., Dastjerdi, H.V. (2011). An Investigation into the impact of traditional vs. blended teaching on EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition: M-learning in focus. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(15), 202-207.

Kilickaya, F. & Krajka, J. (2010). Teachers’ technology use in vocabulary teaching. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 14(1), 81-86.

Kilickaya, F. & Krajka, J. (2010). Comparative usefulness of online and traditional vocabulary learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 55-63.

Kinsella, K. (2005). Preparing for effective vocabulary instruction. A Publication of Aiming High: A Countrywide Commitment to Close the Achievement Gap for English Learners. https://www.scoe.org/docs/ah/AH_kinsella1.pdf

Krashen, S. (2003). Explorations in language acquisition and use. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

Lavin, A. M., Korte, L. & Davies, T. (2010). The impact of classroom technology on student behavior. Journal of Technology Research, 1-13. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

Lin, W.C. & Yang, S. C. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(2), 88-103.

Longhurst, M. (2013). The benefits of explicit vocabulary teaching in the EFL classroom (Unpublished master’s thesis). Malmo University, Sweden.

Ma, Q. & Kelly, P. (2006). Computer assisted vocabulary learning: design and evaluation. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 15-45.

Nation, P., & Wang, M. (1999). Graded readers and vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 12, 355–380.

Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Shakouri, A., Mahdavi, M., Mousavi, Y. & Pourteghali A. A. (2014). The effect of explicit and implicit vocabulary instruction on the reading compression of university students via online classroom, International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research, 2, 522-528.

Shelly, G. B., Cashman, T. J., Gunter, R. E. & Gunter, G. A. (2008). Teachers discovering computers: Integrating media in the classroom. Boston: Course Technology.

Tamjid, N. H. & Moghadam, S. S. (2012). The effect of using vocabulary teaching software on Iranian intermediate Efl learners’ vocabulary acquisition. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19(3), 387-394.

Xue, G. & Nation, I. S. P. (1984). A university word list. Language Learning and Communication, 3(2), 215-229.

Weber, J. M. & Lennon, R. (2007). Multi-course comparison of traditional versus web-based course delivery systems. The Journal of Educators Online, (4)2, 1-19.

West, M. (1953). A general service list of English words. London: Longman.

Wise, D. (2015). Equipping students with 21st century technology skills. Los Angeles: QuikiTech.

Wu, L. (2009). Incidental English vocabulary studying in L2 learning (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kristianstad University College, Sweden.

Wu, L. (2014). Technical college students’ perceptions of English for specific purposes vocabulary learning and teaching. International Journal of English Language Education, 2(1), 176-186.

Zhou, Y. (2012). Using technology to assist in vocabulary acquisition of ESL learners. Linguistic education and research reports, 8, 389-396.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)

ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)



Publisher:

University of Niš

Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia
Phone:    +381 18 257 095
Telefax:  +381 18 257 950


© 2013 by University of Niš, Serbia