ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES MATERIALS: SPORTS SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY ESP MATERIALS IN THE EFL CLASSROOM

Inés Lourido-Badía

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP231018058L
First page
777
Last page
792

Abstract


English as a Foreign Language (EFL) has become the course that most universities have decided to include in their curricula due to the necessity of acquiring English for their future careers in the globalized world we are living nowadays. In order to expand the knowledge of students, at the Universidad Europea del Atlántico – a private university based in Cantabria, Spain – three sessions of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) have been included in the subjects of EFL as part of the compulsory curricula of the different degrees offered. The aim of the present study was to analyze the degree of usefulness and appropriateness of the designed ESP sessions for the degrees in Sports Sciences and Psychology – which are mixed in the English classroom – through the design of a rubric that could check their validity for both the level of English and the level of knowledge in these specific topics for these students in their second academic year at university. The main conclusion was that the degree of relevance, utility and usefulness of the ESP materials taught depends on the teacher, his/her degree of implication, knowledge, and strategies he/she uses when creating these materials.

Keywords

English for specific Purposes, Relevance, CEFR, Authenticity, Specific knowledge

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aguado de Cea, G., and Curado Fuentes, A. 2012. “ESP in Spain: Goals, achievements and prospects” ASp. la revue du GERAS, (62): 91-107.

Association of Languages for Specific Purposes (2021, January). Origins and history of the Association of languages for specific purposes. http://www.aelfe.org/

Bojovic, M. 2006. Teaching foreign languages for specific purposes: Teacher development. In The proceedings of the 31st annual association of teacher education conference (pp. 487-493).

British Council 2021, February. B2 English Level. https://www.britishcouncil.es/en/english/levels/b2

Carver, D. 1983. “Some propositions about ESP”. The ESP journal, 2(2): 131-137.

Cambridge. 2011. “Using the CEFR: Principles of good practice”. Cambridge ESOL, 1-48.

Coleman, J. 2006. “English- medium teaching in European Higher education”. Language Teaching, 39: 1-14.

Hutchinson, T., Waters, A., & Swan, M. 1987. English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kovačević, D. (2023). Design Of Esp Course For Groups Of Students From Different Departments Within Humanities And Social Sciences. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 281-291.

Lubina, B. L. (2023). Adapting Content-Based Material InEsp Courses: The Example Of Deborah Potter’s Handbook Of Independent Journalism. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 319-327.

Mal Amiri, B. 2008. “A program evaluation of ESP education at MS/A and PhD levels at Science and Research Campus, Islamic Azad University”. Human Sciences, 56: 1-28.

Morrow, K. 1977. “Authentic texts in ESP”. English for specific purposes, 13: 17.

Pavón Vázquez, V. & Gaustad, M. 2013. “Designing Bilingual Programmes for Higher Education in Spain: Organisational, Curricular and Methodological Decisions”. International CLILC Research Journal, 2(1): 82-94.

Pérez Cañado, M. L., & Esteban, A. A. 2015. “Authenticity in the teaching of ESP: An evaluation proposal”. Scripta Manent, 1(1): 35-43.

Robinson, P. 1991. ESP today: A practitioners' guide. United States: Prentice Hall.

Shevchenko, M. V. 2015. “Communicative approach to teaching English at technical universities”. Advanced education, (3): 101-107.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP231018058L

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)