DECOLONIZING ANGLOPHONE EAP INFLUENCE IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION CONTEXT
Abstract
It is widely known that English teaching practices are largely rooted in colonialism and linguistic imperialism – the belief in the superiority of the Western teaching methods and linguistic norms established in such countries as the UK and the US. The current trend to decolonize English teaching has been gaining momentum for over three decades but has not entirely penetrated into the mainstream teaching of English, with English for Academic Purposes not being an exception. Relatively little focus has been placed in the research onto non-English speaking contexts with the purpose of analysing the current state of EAP provision at universities and gauging the influence of the native-speakerist academic English norms on EAP students’ writing. In the case of the EU context, it may be particularly pertinent to investigate the potential influence that Brexit might have had in terms of rejecting the imposition of the Standard British English norms and associated teaching approaches. This paper is meant to be a reflection with an attempt to stimulate the discussion of EAP teaching practices and academic discourses in the EU higher education in the post-Brexit era. It will consider the issues in the EAP provision in the EU with the example of Portuguese HE and will reflect on the native-speakerist tendencies within the academia and ways to tackle the dominance of the Anglophone norms. This paper hopes to contribute to the argument in favor of the decolonization of EAP teaching practices in non-English speaking contexts, as decolonization can help foster a more equitable and inclusive world.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barbeiro, Luís Filipe, Luísa Álvares Pereira, and José Brandão Carvalho. “Writing at Portuguese Universities: Students’ Perceptions and Practices.” Journal of Academic Writing 5, no.1 (March 2015): 74–85. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v5i1.169.
Bell, Douglas E. “Methodology in EAP: Why Is It Largely Still an Overlooked Issue?” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 55 (January 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101073.
Benesch, Sarah. Critical English for Academic Purposes. New York: Routledge, 2001. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601803.
Bennett, Karen. “Academic Discourse in Portugal: A Whole Different Ballgame?” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9, no.1 (2010): 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.11.002.
Bennett, Karen. Academic Writing in Portugal: I - Discourses in Conflict. Coimbra: Coimbra University Press, 2011.
Bruce, Emma, and Liz Hamp-Lyons. “Opposing Tensions of Local and International Standards for EAP Writing Programmes: Who Are We Assessing For?” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 18 (June 2015): 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.03.003.
Chun, Christian W. “Contesting Neoliberal Discourses in EAP: Critical Praxis in an IEP Classroom.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8, no.2 (2009): 111–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.09.005.
Clarke, David F. “The Negotiated Syllabus: What Is It and How Is It Likely to Work?” Applied Linguistics 12, no.1 (1991): 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.1.13.
Connor, Ulla. “Intercultural Rhetoric.” The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (January 2018): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0528.
De Chazal, Edward, and Julie Moore. Oxford EAP. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Dimova, Slobodanka. “English Language Requirements for Enrolment in EMI Programs in Higher Education: A European Case.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 47 (September 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100896.
Fischman, Gustavo, E., and Eric Haas. “Critical pedagogy and hope in the context of neo-liberal globalization”. In The Handbook of Social Justice in Education, edited by William Ayers, Therese M. Quinn, and David Stovall, 565-575. London: Routledge, 2008.
Forche, Carolyn. “On the emergence of Euro-English as a potential European variety of English – Attitudes and interpretations”. Ezikoslovlje 13, no.2 (2012): 447-478.
Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin Group, 1972.
Garska, Jessica, and Sarah O’Brien. “Power, identity, and culture in international students’ perceptions of academic writing”. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada 58, no.1 (2019): 62-95. https://doi.org/10.1590/010318138653426454991
Hyland, Ken, and Liz Hamp-Lyons. “EAP: Issues and directions”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 1, no.1 (2002): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00002-4
Jenkins, Jennifer. English as a Lingua Franca in the International University: The Politics of Academic English Language Policy. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014.
Jeyaraj, Joana Joseph, and Tony Harland. “Transforming teaching and learning in ELT through critical pedagogy: An international study”. Journal of Transformative Education 12, no.4 (2014): 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344614550042
Kachru, Braj, B. “Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle”. In English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, edited by Randolph Quirk, H.G. Widdowson, and Yolande Cantù, 11–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
Kaplan, Robert. B. 1966. “Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education”. Language Learning 16, no.1 (1966): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
Kaufhold, Kathrin. “Conventions in postgraduate academic writing: European students’ negotiations of prior writing experience at an English-speaking university”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20 (December 2015): 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.007
Kumaravadivelu, B. “The decolonial option in English Teaching: Can the subaltern Act?” TESOL Quarterly 50, no.1 (2016): 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.202
Lea, Mary, and Brian V. Street. “Student writing in higher education: An Academic Literacies approach”. Studies in Higher Education 23, no.2 (1998): 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
Lillis, Theresa, and Jackie Tuck. “Academic literacies: A critical lens on writing and reading in the academy”. In The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes, edited by Ken Hyland, and Philip Shaw, 30-43. London: Routledge, 2016.
Mortenson, Leah. “Integrating social justice-oriented content into English for Academic Purposes (EAP) instruction: A case study”. English for Specific Purposes 65 (January 2022): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.08.002
Polo, Francisco Javier Fernández, and Mario Cal Varela. “English for Research Purposes at the University of Santiago de Compostela: A survey”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8, no.3 (2009): 152-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.05.003
Sensoy, Özlem, and Robin DiAngelo. Is everyone really equal?: An introduction to key concepts in social justice education. 2nd edn. New York: Teachers College Press, 2017.
Simão, Ana Margarida Veiga, Anabela Abreu Malpique, Lourdes Maria Bragagnolo Frison, and André Marques. “Teaching Writing to middle school students in Portugal and in Brazil: An exploratory study”. Reading and Writing 29 (2016): 955-979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9606-8
Tatzl, Dietmar. “English-Medium masters’ programmes at an Austrian University of Applied Sciences: Attitudes, experiences and challenges”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10, no.4 (2011): 252-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.08.003
Tribble, Christopher. “ELFA vs. Genre: A new paradigm war in EAP writing instruction?” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 25 (January 2017): 30-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.10.003
Turner, Joan. 2012. “Academic Literacies: Providing a space for the socio-political dynamics of EAP”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11 (2012): 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.007
Ypsilandis, George S., and Z. Kantaridou. “English for Academic Purposes: Case studies in Europe”. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 2, no.2 (2007): 69-83. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2007.703
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP230515032F
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)