Udi Samanhudi, Aisling O'Boyle

DOI Number
First page
Last page


This paper examines the similarities and differences in the use of rhetorical citations in research articles in two journal publication contexts in the field of Applied Linguistics, namely Indonesian Journals aimed at a local audience, and International Journals aimed at a global audience. Fifty Discussion Sections from published research articles were taken from the two publication contexts.  Results of the analysis indicate a dominant use of integral citations especially verb-controlling type in the Indonesian local corpus. It is suggested that this citation type requires less demand on synthesising various sources cited while Discussion Sections in the International corpus make greater use of non-integral citations which indicates a succinct synthesis of various sources. In terms of function, referring to literature is the most salient function in Indonesian local corpus while attribution is the most dominant function found in the International corpus. Accompanying the textual analysis of citation practices in these journals, Indonesian academics as part of the community of the discipline were interviewed. Their perspectives indicate urgency for results of genre analysis studies to be transformed into teaching materials to assist especially novice writers in the field of Applied Linguistics in understanding English research article writing conventions better.


Citations practice, Indonesian-based journals, International journals, applied linguistics

Full Text:



Adnan, Z. (2014). ‘Prospects of Indonesian Research Articles (RAs) Being Considered for Publication in Centre Journals: A Comparative Study of Rhetorical Patterns of RAs in Selected Humanities and Hard Science Disciplines’, in Lyda, Andrzej and KrystynaWarchal (Eds) Occupying Niches: Interculturality, Cross-culturality and Aculturality in Academic Research, Cham Heildeberg: Springer, pp: 66-79.

Adnan, Z. (2009). Some potential problems for research articles written by Indonesian academics when submitted to international English language journals. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 11(1), 107-125.

Arsyad, S. (2013a). A genre-based analysis on discussion section of research articles in Indonesian written by Indonesian speakers. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(4),50-70. (

Arsyad, S., Zaim, M., & Susyla, D. (2019). Review and citation style in research article introductions: a comparative study between national and international English-medium journals in medical sciences. Discourse and Interaction, 11(1), 28-51.

Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134-144.

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of the Disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE/ Open University Press.

Cheng, F. W., & Unsworth, L. (2016). Stance-taking as negotiating academic conflict in applied linguistics research article discussion sections. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 43-57.

Coffin, C. J. (2009). Incorporating and evaluating voices in a film studies thesis. Writing & pedagogy, 1(2), 163-193.

Cominos, N. (2011). Managing the subjective: Exploring dialogistic positioning in undergraduate essays (Unpublished PhD thesis). South Australia: University of Adelaide.

Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. M. (2014). Strategies and tactics in academic knowledge production by multilingual scholars. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 32.

ElMalik, A. T., & Nesi, H. (2008). Publishing research in a second language: the case of Sudanese contributors to international medical journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 87-96

Harwood, N. (2009). An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(3), 497-518.

Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Vladimirou, D. (2010). Who's citing whose writings? A corpus based study of citations as interpersonal resource in English medium national and English medium international journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 102-115.

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2017). Points of reference: Changing patterns of academic citation. Applied Linguistics, 40(1), 64-85.

Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58-69.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourse: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Essex: Longman.

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses, Michigan classics ed.: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K. (2005) A convincing argument: corpus analysis and academic persuasion. In Connor, U. & Upton, T. (Eds.) Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp 87-114.

Hyland, K. (1999b). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied linguistics, 20(3), 341-367.

Hyland, K. (1997). Scientific claims and community values: Articulating an academic culture. Language & Communication, 17(1), 19-31.

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987) English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-centred Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Jalilifar, A., Hayati, A. M., & Namdari, N. (2012). Comparative study of research article discussion sections of local and international applied linguistic journals. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 9(1), 1-29.

Kafes, H. (2017). Citation practices among novice and expert academic writers. Egitim ve Bilim, 42(192).

Lee, J. J., Hitchcock, C., & Casal, J. E. (2018). Citation practices of L2 university students in first-year writing: Form, function, and stance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 1-11.

Mansourizadeh, K., & Ahmad, U. K. (2011). Citation practices among non-native expert and novice scientific writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 152-161.

Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press

Petric, B. (2007). Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master's theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 238-253.

Pho, P., & Tran, T. (2016). Obstacles to Scholarly Publishing in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A Case Study of Vietnamese Scholars. Publications, 4(3), 19.

Samraj, B. (2013). Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master's theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), 299-310.

Swales, J. (1986). Citation analysis and discourse analysis. Applied linguistics, 7(1), 39-56.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (Vol. 1). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Swales,J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, S. (2001) ‘Evaluating and applying discourse analytic approach’, in Wetherall, S., Taylor, S., and yates, S.J. (Eds) Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. London, UK: sage, pp311-330.

Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Tidhar, D. (2006). Automatic classification of citation function. InProc. of EMNLD-06, Sydney, Australia

Thompson, P. (2000). Citation practices in PhD theses. In L. Burnard & T. McEnery (Eds.), Rethinking language pedagogy from a corpus perspective. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Thompson, P., & Tribble, C. (2001). Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning & Technology, 5(3), 91-105.

White, H. D. (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied linguistics, 25(1), 89-116.

Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for specific purposes, 22(4), 365-385.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)