EUPHEMIZATION AS PART OF RUSSIAN MEDIA OPPOSITION DISCOURSE

Vadim Golubev, Alla Teplyashina

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1904453T
First page
453
Last page
462

Abstract


Opposition discourse does not have a long history or established traditions in Russia as it does in the West where it has long become an integral part of political culture and plays a special role in modern mass communications. This paper raises the problem of risks associated with the danger of critical journalism being branded extremism on the one hand and violating the law prohibiting journalist using vocabulary not part of the Russian literary standard, on the other. It presents the results of content analysis of media texts that use a variety of expressive means of veiling sharp criticism of Russian government and mitigating emotions such as euphemisms. Considerable attention is paid to queering as an aspect of the verbal picture of an anti-world. A case study of Novaya Gazeta, the most consistent critic of Russian government, illustrates the impact recent legislation on extremism and the use of the Russian language has had on journalism in Russia and examines the ways opposition media have employed to comply with the regulations.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arpentieva M. R. (2018) “Discourses and practices of queering in modern media”. Sovremennyi diskurs-analiz, 3 (2).p. 151-158.

Bakhtin M. M. (1990) Francois Rabelais’s works and the folk culture of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance). 2nd edition. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura. p.16.

Davydova S. V. (2011) The language of the media. Lingua mobilis, 2 (28). p. 93.

Demiankov V. Z. (2002) “Political discourse as a subject of political science philology.” Politicheskie nauki. Politichesky diskurs: istoria i sovremennye issledovania. Gerasimov V. I. & Ilyin M. V. (eds.). Moscow: RAN INION, p.34.

Fateeva N. A. (2001) “The main trends in the development of poetic language at the end of the 20th century.” Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 50. p. 416-434.

Garant (2019a). The Garant Legal Reference System of the Russian Federation. http://ivo.garant.ru/#/document/12127578/paragraph/51:0). Accessed on 03.10.19

Garant (2019b). The Garant Legal Reference System of the Russian Federation. http://ivo.garant.ru/#/document/12127578/paragraph/38010:0). Accessed on 03.10.19.

Garant (2019c). The Garant Legal Reference System of the Russian Federation. http://base.garant.ru/12140387/). Accessed on 03.10.19.

Gorshkov A. V. (2012) “Ideological rationale for the concept of ‘rogue states’ in theory and in practice.” Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatestve. 2. p. 266-269, 117, 120.

Grigoriev I.V. (2018) “Features of the functioning of the Latin American model of media systems: a case study of Paraguayan media.” Mediascope. Issue. 4. Access Mode: http://www.mediascope.ru/2486, DOI: 10.30547/mediascope.4.2018.4

Gudkov L. D. (2015) “Resentment nationalism.” Politicheskaia kontseptologiia. 4. p. 118.

Issers O. S. (2017) “Viral euphemization in the context of mass speech culture.” Trudy instituta russkogo iazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova. Moldovan A. M. (ed.). Kultura russkoi rechi Series. Issue.13. Moscow: Institut russkogo iazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova RAN, p.45.

Iumadilov R. F. (2013) “The evolution of political protest: from opposition views to opposition activity.” Voprosy natsionalnykh i federativnykh otnoshenii. 1(20). p.144.

Kakorina E. V. (1996) “The stylistic design of the opposition press.” Russkii iazyk kontsa XX stoletiia (1985-1995). Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kultury, p. 409-426.

Karaulov I. N. (2010) “Russian language and language personality.” 7th edition. Moscow: Izdatelstvo LKI.

Katsev A. M. (1976) “Euphemistic potential and its realization in speech.” Nekotorye problemy slova i predlozheniia v sovremennom angliiskom iazyke. Deeva I. M. (ed.). Gorkii: Gorkovskii pedadogicheskii institut. p. 19-35.

Kheld D. (2014) Democratic models. 3rd edition. Moscow: ID Delo RANKhiGS. p.429.

Krysin L. P. (1996) “Euphemisms in modern Russian language.” Russkii iazyk kontsa XX stoletiia (1985-1995). Zemskaia E. A. (ed.). Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kultury. p. 384-408.

Larin B. A. (1961) “On euphemisms.” Problemy iazykoznaniia: Sbornik statei, posviashchennyi 75-letiiu akad. I. I. Meshchaninova. Larin B. A. (ed.). Leningrad: LGU. p.120.

Levin I. I. (1996) “On the obsessive expressions of the Russian language.” Anti-mir russkoi kul'tury. Iazyk. Folklor. Literatura. Bogomolov N. A. (ed.). Moscow: Ladomir,. p. 110.

Melnik G. S., Misonzhnikov B. I. (2015) The sociolinguistic markers of extremist text.” Gumanitarnyi vektor. Filologiia Series. Vostokovedenie. 4(44). p.108.

Pavliuchuk V. P. (2012) “I. Kerner’s political and civic poetry.” Vysshee gumanitarnoe obrazovanie XXI veka: problemy i perspektivy. Materialy sedmoi mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Samara: Samarskii gosudarstvennyi sotsialno-pedagogicheskii universitet. p.247-254.

Sakhno O. S. (2006) Phrasal nomination as a means of speech euphemization: a study of the language of Russian fiction of the 19th and 21st centuries. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.01. Piatigorsk.

Sepir E. (1993) Selected works in linguistics and cultural studies. Moscow: Progress.

Shevchenko A. S. (2012) Theater discourse: structure, genres, features of linguistic representation (for example, Russian, English, Buryat languages)). Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk. St Petersburg.

Shveitser A. (1993) The decline and revival of culture. Moscow: Prometei.

Solganik G. I. (2005) “On the structure and the most important parameters of publicistic speech (language of the media).” Iazyk sovremennoi publitsistiki. Solganik G. I. (ed.). Moscow: Flinta, p.13–30.

Vostrikova O. V. (2012) “On the comic function of euphemisms.” Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriia: Filologiia. Teoriia iazyka. Iazykovoe obrazovanie. 1. p.17-23.

Uspenskii B. A. (1996) “Mythological aspect of Russian expressive phraseology.” Anti-mir russkoi kul'tury. Iazyk. Fol'klor. Literatura. Bogomolov N. A. (ed.). Moscow: Ladomir. p.9, 110.

Wierzbicka A. (1996) Semantics, culture and cognition. Moscow: Russkie slovari.

Zharkova T. V. (2013) “Media language as an indicator of the speech culture of modern society.” Nauchnye trudy SWORLD. 4. p.75–79.

Zheltukhina M. R. (2007a) “Suggestive influence in Russian, English and German linguistic cultures.” Kommunikativnye tekhnologii v obrazovanii, biznese, politike i prave Cheloveka: Chelovek i ego diskurs. Issue 3. Moscow: IIaRAN; Volgograd: PrinTerra,. p. 201-213.

Zheltukhina M. R. (2007b) “On media discourse content.” Vestnik Luganskogo natsionalnogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni Tarasa Shevchenko: Filologicheskie nauki. Chapter 1., 11(128). p. 27-40.

Zubova L. V. (2014) The role of euphemisms in language dynamics. XLIII Mezhdunarodnaia filologicheskaia nauchnaia konferentsiia. 2014. 11-16 marta. Tezisy. St Petersburg: SPbGU. p. 444




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1904453T

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)

ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)



Publisher:

University of Niš

Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia
Phone:    +381 18 257 095
Telefax:  +381 18 257 950


© 2013 by University of Niš, Serbia