PERFORMING LANGUAGE FUNCTIONS IN GERMAN LEGISLATIVE TEXTS

Elena Yurevna Balashova, Olga Vladimirovna Nagoga, Elena Anatolyevna Makshantseva

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1904505B
First page
505
Last page
516

Abstract


The article deals with the functions of legislative texts in German, describes the models of language functions in the context of pragmatic theory, and distinguishes basic, communicative, and specific pragmatic functions of the legal language. The aim of the study is to identify the specific functions of the language and to analyze the peculiarities of their manifestation in the texts of laws in German. The taxonomical and pragmatic methods along with the method of functional analysis were used to create the methodological basis for identifying the specific features of these functions in the texts of laws. As a result of the research, specific language functions were revealed - the functions of nomination, message, communication and influence in German legislative texts. The authors came to the conclusion that the functions of message and influence are more brightly demonstrated in the texts and they are implemented in the text of the law with the help of multilevel linguistic means and their combinations.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arutyunova, N. D. and Paducheva E. V. 1985. Origins, problems and categories of pragmatics. New In Foreign Linguistics. No. 16, p. 3-42. Linguistic Pragmatics. Mos-cow: Progress.

Austin, John. 1950. “Truth”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Supplementary Volume. No. 24, p. 111–128; reprinted in Austin, 1979, p. 117–133. doi:10.1093/019283021X.003.0005.

Austin, John. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. 2nd ed., M. Sbisà and J.O. Urmson (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Berūkštienė, Donata. 2016. Legal discourse reconsidered: genres of legal texts. Compara-tive Legilinguistics. Vol. 28. https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/cl/article/view/7435/7467 DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/cl.2016.28.5.

Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.

Bulygina, Т.V. 1981. About the scope and content of pragmatics. Proceedings of Acade-my of Sciences of the USSR. Series of Literature and Language. Vol. 40. Issue 4., p. 333-342. Moscow: Nauka.

Eriksson, Owen. The Pragmatic Language Functionality of Information Systems http://www.vits.org/publikationer/dokument/252.pdf

Formanovskaya, N.I. 1998. Communicative-Pragmatic Aspects of Communication Units. Moscow: IKAR Publishing.

Große, Ernst U. 1976. Text und Kommunikation: Eine linguistische Einführung in die Funktion der Texte. Stuttgart; Berlin: W. Kohlhammer.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1986. Communicative Rationality and the Theories of Meaning and Action. In: Habermas J. 1998. On the Pragmatics of Communication. (ed). Cooke M., MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts.

Halliday, Michael A. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Iriskhanova, K.M. 2000. Stylistic resources of the language and the paradigm of their research. Stylistic Aspects of Discourse: Collection of Studies. Issue 451, p. 16-26. Mos-cow: Publishers MGLU.

Kashanina, T.V and Kashanin, A.V. 1996. Fundamentals of Russian Law. Moscow: Pub-lishers group INFRA-M-NORMA.

Kifer, Ferenc. 1985. About the role of pragmatics in the linguistic description. New in Foreign Linguistics. Issue 16, p. 333-347. Linguistic Pragmatics. Moscow: Progress.

Kolshansky, G.V. 1984. Communicative Function and Structure of Language. Moscow: Nauka.

Korpimies, Liisa. 1983. Linguistic Approach to the Analysis and Cohesion with Special Reference to «The Birthday Party» by Harold Pinter. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväsky-lä.

Malko, A.V. 1999. Theory of the State and Law in Questions and Answers. 3rd ed. Mos-cow: Jurist.

Marchenko, M. N. 2004. Theory of State and Law. 2nd ed. Moscow: Prospekt.

Martine, Andre. 1963. Foundations of General linguistics. New in Linguistics [Collection of research papers. Translation]. Vol. 3, p. 347-566. Moscow: Publisher of Foreign Literature.

Mey, Jacob L. 1996. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

Morris, Charles. 1946. Signs, Language and Behavior. New York: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Naer, V. L. 1990. Pragmatic essence of stylistic markedness. Problems of Stylistic Mark-edness [Collection of research papers]. Issue 356, p. 4-9. Moscow: Moscow State Linguistic University.

Nikitina, V. V. 2003. English linguocultural specifics of business discourse. Ecolinguis-tics: theory, problems, methods [Collection of research papers]. Saratov: Nauchnaya Kniga. P. 74-78.

Sarina, Z. M. 1999. Pragmatic grounds for using repetition in speech forms [PhD degree research paper]. Moscow.

Searl, John R. 1973. Linguistik und Sprachphilosophie. Linguistik und Nachbarwissen-schaften. In: Renate Bartsch und Theo Vennemann (Hrsg.). Kronberg/Ts. P. 113-125.

Stalnaker, Robert C. 1972. Pragmatics. Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. P. 380-397.

Stepanov, Yu.S. Methods and principles of modern linguistics. Moscow: Nauka.

Tiersma, Peter M. 2003. The Creation, Structure and Interpretation of the Legal Text, ac-cessed on 18 June, 2018, http:// www.languageandlaw.org/legaltext

.htm

Tikhomirov, Yu. A. 1992. The Function of the Law. Moscow: Izvestiya.

Turi, Joseph-G. 2012. Language Law and Language Rights. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse. Volume 2. Issue 4, p. 1-18. Australia, Hong Kong and UK: Aca-demic Scholars Publishing House.

Vinogradov, V.V. 1963. Stylistics, theory of poetic speech, poetics. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1904505B

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)

ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)



Publisher:

University of Niš

Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia
Phone:    +381 18 257 095
Telefax:  +381 18 257 950


© 2013 by University of Niš, Serbia