Nijolė Burkšaitienė, Jolita Šliogerienė

DOI Number
First page
Last page


This study explores undergraduate students’ experience of learning English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and aims to reveal their views regarding university teachers’ and peers’ feedback provided to them during the course of ESP as well as to establish the students’ views regarding their own learning ESP. The present article reports on the results of a case study from a Lithuanian university. The data were collected from feedback questionnaires of 111 students in 11 study programmes. To analyse the data, quantitative methodology was used. The main conclusion of the present study is that most study participants viewed their own learning ESP at the university as a positive experience, i.e. the students were satisfied with their engagement in learning this study subject and considered that learning was aligned with teaching and assessment. The results of the study also demonstrated that the study participants considered that collaboration and team work fostered meaningful learning, as well as that peer feedback helped them to understand how to improve in learning ESP. It was established that students valued their teachers’ patience and personal engagement and that the teachers’ feedback improved the ways of learning ESP, encouraged them to think and analyse the content of the study material, and helped them to clarify things they did not understand learning on their own. 


students’ experience, ESP studies, teachers’ feedback, peers’ feedback, views regarding learning ESP, higher education

Full Text:



Allen, Christopher. 2015. “Social media as an alternative to Moodle in EFL teaching practice forums”. F. Helm, L. Bradley, M. Guarda, & S. Thouesny (Eds.), Critical CALL – Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference, Padova, Italy (9-15). Dublin:

Biggs, John. 1999. “What student does: teaching for enhanced learning”. Higher Education Research and Development 18 (1): 57-75. Accessed February 16, 2012. Doi: 10. 1080/0729436990180105.

Black, Peter, and William, Dylan. 1998. “Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment”. Phi Delta Kappan 80 (2): 139-148.

Brown, George. 2001. Assessment: A Guide for Lecturers. York: Learning and Teaching Support Network Generic Centre.

Burkšaitienė, Nijolė. 2012. “Peer feedback for fostering students’ metacognitive skills of thinking about learning in a course of English for law”. Societal Studies 4 (4): 1341-1355.

Burkšaitienė, Nijolė, and Stojković, Nadežda. 2016. “Students’ reflections in a course of modern English and creative writing: a path to self-regulated learning”. Kalba ir kontekstai / Language in Different Contexts 7 (1) Part 2: 212-225.

Burkšaitienė, Nijolė, and Teresevičienė, Margarita. 2008. “Integrating alternative learning and assessment in a course of English for law students”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (2): 155-166.

Buzzetto-More, Nicole. 2015. “Student attitudes towards the integration of YouTube in online hybrid and web-assisted course: an examination of the impact of course modality on perception”. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 11 (1): 55-73.

Carrington, Suzanne, and Selva, Gitta. 2010. “Critical social theory and transformative learning: evidence in pre-service teachers’ service-learning reflection logs”. Higher Education Research & Development 29 (1): 45-57.

Ezer, Hanna, Gilat, Izhak, and Sagee, Rachel. 2010. “Perception of teacher education and professional identity among novice teachers”. European Journal of Teacher Education 33 (4): 391-404.

Fernandes, Sandra, Flores Maria, and Lima, Rui Manuel. 2012. “Students’ views regardingassessment in project-led engineering education: findings from a case study in Portugal”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (2): 163-178.

Gibbs, Graham. 1999. “Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn”. S. Brown, & A. Glasner (Eds.), Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches. Maidenhead: SRHE / Open University Press.

Hattie, John, and Timperley, Helen. 2007. “The Power of feedback”. Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81-112. Accessed August 12, 2018.

Kavaliauskienė, Galina, Kaminskienė, Ligija, and Anusienė, Lilija. 2007. “Reflective practice: assessment of assignments in English for Specific Purposes”. Ibérica 14: 149-166. Accessed August 15, 2018.

Knight, Peter. 2001. A Briefing on Key Concepts: Formative and Summative, Criterion and Norm-referenced Assessment. Assessment Series 7. York: Learning and Teaching Support Network Generic Centre.

Lam, Ricky. 2013. “Two portfolio systems: EFL students’ perceptions of writing ability, text improvement, and feedback”. Assessing Writing 18: 132-153.

Lina, Yu-Ju, and Wangb, Hung-Chun. 2018. “Using enhanced OER videos to facilitate English L2 learners’ multicultural competence”. Computers & Education 125: 74-85. Accessed August 15, 2018. Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.005.

Liu, Ngar-Fun, and Carless, David. 2006. “Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment”. Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3 July): 279-290. Accessed August 15, 2018.

Maund, Barry. 2003. Perceptions. (Philosophy). Chesham: Acumen. Accessed June 15, 2012.

McDowell, Liz, Wakelin, Delia, Montgomery, Catherine, and King, Sara. 2011. “Does assessment for learning make a difference? The development of a questionnaire to explore the student response”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (7): 749-765. Accessed August 12, 2018. Doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.488792.

Nicol, David, and Macfarlane-Dick, Debra. Rethinking Formative Assessment: A Theoretical Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice. Enhancing Student Learning Through Effective Formative Feedback. York: The Higher Education Academy Generic Centre. Accessed June 24, 2011.

Price, Margaret, Handley, Kare, and Millar, Jill. 2011. “Feedback: focusing on engagement”. Studies in Higher Education 36 (8): 879-896.

Ramsden, Paul. 1987. “Improving teaching and learning in higher education: the case for a relational perspective”. Studies in Higher Education 12 (3): 275-286. Accessed April 18, 2012.

Ramsden, Paul. 2003. Learning to teach in higher education. Abington, Oxon: RoutlegeFalmer.

Ryder, John. 1987. “Person perception in post-secondary education“. The Vocational Aspect of Education 39 (104): 81-93. Accessed April 27, 2015. Doi: 10. 1080/ 10408347308002941.

Sánchez, Aurelio Villa, Ruiz, Manuel Poblete, Olalla, Ana García, Mora, Gonzalo Mora, Paredes, José Antonio Marin, Otero, José Moya, San Ildefonso, Isabel Muñoz, and Eizaguirre, Josu Solabarrieta. Competence-based Learning: A Proposal for the Assessment of Generic Competences. Bilbao: University of Deusto, 2008.

Suchanova, Jelena; Šliogerienė, Jolita; Mockienė, Liudmila. 2017. “A paradigm shift in teaching business English vocabulary”. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes 5 (2): 247-257.

Šliogerienė, Jolita. 2013. “Development of self-regulation at university studies”. Coactivity: Philology, Education 21 (2): 162-169.

Šliogerienė, Jolita. 2012. “Students’ reflection analysis in portfolio-based learning”. Coactivity: Philology, Education 20 (1): 98-105.

Šliogerienė, Jolita. 2016. “Using portfolios to enhance self-regulated learning”. Sustainable Multilingualism 9: 186-204.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)

ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)


University of Niš

Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia
Phone:    +381 18 257 095
Telefax:  +381 18 257 950

© 2013 by University of Niš, Serbia