ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES AND THE ENHANCEMENT OF FRENCH TRAINEE CONTENT TEACHERS’ PROFESSIONAL SKILLS

Severine WOZNIAK

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1803341W
First page
341
Last page
352

Abstract


This paper explores the issue of syllabus design for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) classes by presenting a case study carried out at the Grenoble Faculty of Economics and the Grenoble Initial Teacher Training College (France). The study had two objectives: develop prospective and newly recruited content teachers’ professional skills, notably the ability to teach their subject in English on an occasional basis, and help them reflect on their professional practice. In order to do so, mandatory EAP modules for all trainee content teachers (TCT) of disciplines other than language studies were implemented to provide TCTs with an introduction to content and language integrated learning (CLIL) and to train them to teach in a CLIL format. In this paper two types of data are analyzed: the assessment of TCTs’ final assignment and the responses to a questionnaire aiming at gathering TCTs’ feedback on the EAP modules.


Keywords

content and language integrated learning (CLIL), English for Academic Purposes (EAP), pre-service teachers, trainee teachers

Full Text:

PDF

References


American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (2006). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press.

Arnó-Macià, E. & Mancho-Barés, G. (2015). The role of content and language in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at university: Challenges and implications for ESP. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 63-73. Retrieved June 5th, 2018, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.007.

Basturkmen, H. & Shackleford, N. (2015). How content lecturers help students with language: An observational study of language-related episodes in interaction in first year accounting classrooms. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 87-97. Retrieved June 5th, 2018, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.08.001.

Bertaux, P. et al. (2009). The CLIL teacher’s competences grid. Common Constitution and Language Learning (CCLL) Comenius-Network. Retrieved April 16th, 2017, from http://ccll-eu.eu/cms02/index.php?id=62.

Chamot, A.U. & B. Genovese. (2009). Using Student Choice in Foreign Language Teaching to Make Connections to Other Disciplines. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6/2, 150-160. Retrieved June 5th, 2018, from http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v6n22009/chamot.pdf.

Coyle, D. (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning – Motivating Learners and Teachers. The Scottish Languages Review, 13, 1-18.

Gomez R., L. F. (2017). Learning by teaching: Training ELF pre-service teachers through inquiry-based learning. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 14/1, 21-36. Retrieved June 5th, 2018, from http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v14n12017/gomez.pdf.

Graddol, D. (2006). English Next. Why global English may mean the end of “English as a Foreign Language”. London: The British Council. Retrieved April 16th, 2017, from http://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/ec/files/books-english-next.pdf.

Greere, A. & Räsänen, A.. (2008). Year One Report. LANQUA Subproject on Content and Language Integrated Learning. Retrieved April 16th, 2017, from http://www.lanqua.eu/sites/default/files/Year1Report_CLIL_ForUpload_WithoutAppendices_0/index.pdf.

Guillamón-Suesta, F. & Renau Renau, M.-L. (2015). A critical vision of the CLIL approach in secondary education: A study in the Valencian Community in Spain. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 8/1, 1-12. Retrieved June 5th, 2018, from http://laclil.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/LACLIL/article/view/5037.

Haigh, M. et al. (2013). Judging teacher candidates’ readiness to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 1-11.

Hillyard, S. (2011). First Steps in CLIL: Training the Teachers. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 4/2, 1-12. Retrieved June 5th, 2018, from http://laclil.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/LACLIL/article/view/2631.

Karimi, M. (2011). Variations in EFL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge base as a function of their teaching license status. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 3/3, 83–114. Retrieved June 5th, 2018, from http://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/mobile/article_379_6ccac0606c1d0033615189cac5dc52c2.pdf.

Moreno-Murcia, J. A. et al. (2015). Questionnaire evaluating teaching competencies in the university environment. Evaluation of teaching competencies in the university. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 4/1, 54-61. Retrieved June 5th, 2018, from https://naerjournal.ua.es/article/view/106.

Nestojko, J. (2014). Expecting to teach enhances learning and organization of knowledge in free recall of text passages. Memory & Cognition, 42/7, p.1038–1048. Retrieved June 5th, 2018, from https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13421-014-0416-z.

Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Tutor learning: The role of explaining and responding to questions. Instructional Science, 36, 321–350. Retrieved June 5th, 2018, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23372885?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Stollhans, S. (2016). Learning by teaching: Developing transferable skills. In E. Corradini, K. Borthwick & A. Gallagher-Brett (Eds.), Employability for languages: A handbook, 161–164. Dublin: Researchpublishing.net. Retrieved June 5th, 2018, from http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34412/1/478.pdf.

Taillefer, G. (2013). CLIL in higher education: the (perfect?) crossroads of ESP and didactic reflection. ASp, 63, 31-53.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1803341W

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)

ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)



Publisher:

University of Niš

Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia
Phone:    +381 18 257 095
Telefax:  +381 18 257 950


© 2013 by University of Niš, Serbia