EXPLORING ACADEMIC WRITING WITH GRICE

Mark Wyatt, Roger Nunn

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1803365W
First page
365
Last page
375

Abstract


While the organization of most academic writing courses around the introduction and practice of discrete linguistic elements might suit those learners who adopt a more atomistic approach to language learning, this approach might not be so appropriate for those learners searching for a more holistic understanding. For the latter group, a course centered on a pragmatic view of discourse, and drawing on Gricean maxims, which can provide a framework within which features of genre-specific academic writing can be explored, might be appropriate. Such courses remain rare. Where they are provided, they might be evaluated with the help of students’ reflections on their learning, which can provide insights that facilitate subsequent course development. Set in a largely curriculum-free Middle Eastern university context in which Gricean maxims had been previously employed in the teaching of academic writing, this study reports on one such course developed through negotiation with students. It analyses students’ reflections on which aspects of the input they had found most salient and why. Benefits of the course, in terms of students’ awareness of how their conceptions of academic writing had developed through critically evaluating a chosen text using Gricean maxims as a framework, are highlighted.


Keywords

pragmatics, Gricean maxims, academic writing, critical analysis, Middle East

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abari, A.F. & Lofti, A.R. (2013). The Gricean maxim of quantity in academic texts: A study of English and Persian journal articles written by both native and non-native speakers. International Journal of Basic Sciences and Applied Research, 2(12), 1023-1029.

Almalki, H.S. (2015). How culturally situated notions of ‘politeness’ forms influence the way Saudi postgraduate students write academic English? Unpublished Masters’ dissertation. Monash University, Australia.

https://au-east.erc.monash.edu.au/fpfiles/7641943/monash_161311.pdf

Arumugam, N., Rafik-Galea, S., de Mello, G. & Dass, L.C. (2013). Cultural influences on group learning in an ESL classroom. Review of European Studies, 5(2), 81-89.

http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/res/article/view/27829

Beddoes, K. & Panther, G. (2017). Gender and teamwork: An analysis of professors’ perspectives and practices. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(3), 330-343.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03043797.2017.1367759

Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J.L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.

Grice, H.P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3), 239-256.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0889490694900043

Hyland, K. (2002). Options of identity in academic writing. ELT Journal, 56(4), 351-358.

https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article-abstract/56/4/351/410117

Lee, I. (2002). Teaching coherence to ESL students: a classroom inquiry. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 135-159.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374302000656

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunn, R. (2006). The pragmatics of cooperation and relevance for teaching and learning. The Linguistics Journal, 1, 5-16. http://www.linguistics-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/January2006_V1.pdf#page=5

Nunn, R. (2009). Developing pragmatic competence for critical academic reading in Explorations in Cohen, R. (ed.), Explorations in second language reading. Alexandria, U.S.A.: TESOL International Publications, pp. 117-131.

Nunn, R. & Deveci, T. (in press). ‘Holistic argumentation creation’: Integrated principles for helping graduate students create a journal paper. In J.N. Corcoran, L.M. Muresan, & K. Englander (Eds.), Pedagogies and Policies on Publishing Research in English: Local Initiatives Supporting International Scholars. New York: Routledge.

Swales, J.M. & Feak, C.B. (2009). Abstracts and the Writing of Abstracts. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Thompson, P. & Tribble, C. (2001). Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning Technology, 5(3), 91-105.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul_Thompson20/publication/220017768_Looking_at_citations_Using_corpora_in_English_for_Academic_Purposes/links/544e97da0cf26dda0890173e.pdf

Tseng, M.Y. (2015). Describing creative products in an intercultural context: Toward a pragmatic and empirical account. Journal of Pragmatics, 80, 52-69.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216615000703

White, R. (2001). Adapting Grice’s maxims in the teaching of writing. ELT Journal, 55(1), 62-69.

https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article-abstract/55/1/62/3114082

Wittgenstein, L. (2001 [1953]). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1803365W

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)

ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)



Publisher:

University of Niš

Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia
Phone:    +381 18 257 095
Telefax:  +381 18 257 950


© 2013 by University of Niš, Serbia