CRITICAL THINKING, STRATEGIC LEARNING AND METACOGNITION IN ESP

Danica Stanimir Pirsl, Solzica Popovska, Nadezda Stojkovic

DOI Number
-
First page
603
Last page
613

Abstract


Many students have trouble making a transition to the more independent learning required at the university level of studies as compared to their previous study levels and habits. University study requires students to take responsibility for their own learning, to be more self-directed, to make decisions about what they will focus on and how much time they will spend on learning both inside and outside the classroom. How does this fact relate to ESP? First, students are highly motivated to learn their future expertise language. From the first year on they have to write seminar papers, thus writing skills come to the fore. They are asked to give oral presentations so they need their professional language. Now, they pay more attention to their mistakes, they are anxious to improve their performance. At their second year of studies they are preparing to go abroad, usually the States. Naturally, they need conversational experience and insist on learning it. And we as teachers must follow the ESP scheme of fulfilling the students' needs and prepare them for the harsh reality of the labor market so they can competently join their respective discourse communities. This transition may be especially difficult for students who may be used to more support and direction and even ‘parent-like’ relationships with their teachers at university. It will be useful for them to know precisely how they are responsible for their learning in their new setting. This will require them to understand that they need to play a more active role in their own learning and will require greater self-motivation and organization and greater self-awareness (metacognition) of their learning needs and behaviors. Therefore, it is important that this pivotal concept of independent learning is explained to students on the onset of their studies, so that they know what is required of them within their new study context and disciplines taught.

Key words: critical thinking, independent learning, university setting, ESP, students


Full Text:

PDF

References


Atay, Derin, and Cengiz Ozbulgan. "Memory strategy instruction, contextual learning and ESP vocabulary recall." English for specific purposes 26, no. 1 (2007): 39-51.

Ajideh, Parviz. "Autonomous Learning and Metacognitive Strategies Essentials in ESP Class." English language teaching 2, no. 1 (2009): 162-168.

Auerbach, Elsa Roberts, and Diane Paxton. "“It's Not the English Thing”: Bringing Reading Research Into the ESL Classroom." Tesol Quarterly 31, no. 2 (1997): 237-261.

Badger, Richard, and Goodith White. "A process genre approach to teaching writing." ELT journal 54, no. 2 (2000): 153-160.

Block, Cathy Collins. Teaching comprehension: The comprehension process approach. Allyn & Bacon, 2004.

Cotterall, Sara. "Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: Principles for designing language courses." ELT journal 54, no. 2 (2000): 109-117

Flowerdew, John, and Matthew Peacock. "The EAP curriculum: Issues, methods, and challenges." Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (2001): 177-194.

Horowitz, Daniel M. "What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom." TESOL quarterly 20, no. 3 (1986): 445-462.

Hutchinson, Tom, and Alan Waters. English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Jiménez, Robert T., Georgia Earnest García, and P. David Pearson. "The reading strategies of bilingual Latina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles." Reading Research Quarterly 31, no. 1 (1996): 90-112.

Kintsch, Walter, and Teun A. Van Dijk. "Toward a model of text comprehension and production." Psychological review 85, no. 5 (1978): 363.

Nunan, David. "Strategy training in the language classroom: An empirical investigation." RELC journal 28, no. 2 (1997): 56-81.

O'malley, J. Michael, and Anna Uhl Chamot. Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge university press, 1990.

Oxford, R.L., 1989. “The Best and the Worst”: An Exercise to Tap Perceptions of Language‐Learning Experiences and Strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 22(5), pp.447-454.

Phye, Gary D., and Thomas Andre. Cognitive classroom learning: Understanding, thinking, and problem solving. Academic Pr, 1986.

Rubin, Joan, ed. Learner strategies in language learning. Macmillan College, 1987.

Schraw, Gregory. "Promoting general metacognitive awareness." Instructional science 26, no. 1 (1998): 113-125.

Victori, Mia, and Walter Lockhart. "Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning." System 23, no. 2 (1995): 223-234.

Voller, Peter. "Does the teacher have a role in autonomous language learning?" Autonomy and independence in language learning (1997): 98-113.

Wenden, Anita L. "Metacognitive knowledge and language learning." Applied linguistics 19, no. 4 (1998): 515-537.

Widdowson, Henry George. Explorations in applied linguistics. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)