Hossein Alinezhad, Majid Nemati

DOI Number
First page
Last page


Language forms an inseparable part of everyday life. Among its several uses, its role in politics is not negligible. If not the most, politicians are ranked among professional users of language. Through this, they not only communicate, but also persuade people, evoke emotions, and pave the way for their own success and superiority of their parties. To achieve this goal, men of politics use various linguistic and pragmatic properties of language. Personal pronouns, as a linguistic tool which possess an important pragmatic function, are of utmost interest to politicians. In fact, they utilise personal pronouns dexterously and frequently. Contrary to the simplicity of syntactic use, the pragmatics of personal pronouns is not always easy to grasp. Therefore, in order to be fully comprehended, they must be scrutinised in the context of use. This is of vital importance in the political sphere. The present research aimed at investigating the differences in the use of the first personal pronouns (FPPs) and their concurrence with the different types of speech acts. To this end, the researchers analysed 24 speeches by the United Nations representatives of China, the UAE, the UK, and the USA, which were addressed to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) from 2012 to 2017. The results revealed that among five classes of the FPPs,”"Exclusive We” (982 samples), and "I As an Individual" (7 samples) were the most and the least frequently used ones. In addition, "Commissives" with 818 samples and "Declartives" with 120 samples held the first and the last rank among the speech act types utilised by the four politicians. Finally, the concurrence of "Exclusive We" with" Commissives" was the highest one among all other samples.


personal pronouns, first personal pronouns, speech acts, political speech

Full Text:



Allen, W. (2007). Australian political discourse: Pronominal choice in campaign speeches. In I. Mushin & M. Laughren (Eds.), Annual meeting of the Australian Linguistic Society. Retrieved from http://espace.library.uq.edu.au

Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Our masters' voices: The Language and body language of politics. London: Methuen.

Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words? Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Beard, A. (2000). Language of Politics. London: Routledge

Bramley, N. R. (2001). Pronouns of Politics: The use of pronouns in the construction of ‘self’ and ‘other’ in political interviews. Retrieved from digitalcollections.anu.edu.au

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.

Collins, C. (1990). English grammar. London: Collins ELT

Connor, U., & Upton, A.T. (Eds.). (2004). Discourse in the professions. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam.

Druszak, A. (2010). Re-reading the communist past in Poland: The dynamics of us and them. In A. Druszak, J. House, L. Kumiega (Eds.), Globalization, discourse, media: In a critical perspective (pp.191-209). Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.

Durant, A. & Lambrou, M. (2009). Language and media: A resource book for students. London and New York: Routledge.

Ellis, R. (2007). The study of second language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Harlow: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.

Fasold, R.W. & Connor-Linton, J. (Eds.). (2006). An introduction to language and linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2000). An Introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Jones, J. & Peccei, J. S. (2004). Language and politics. In L. Thomas (Ed.), Language, society, and power. New York: Routledge.

Levinson, S. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Malone, M.J. (1997). Worlds of talk: The presentation of self in everyday conversation. Oxford: Polity Press.

Pennycook, A. (1994). The politics of pronouns. ELT Journal, 48(2):173-8.

Richards, C. J. & Schmidt, R. (2002). Dictionary of language teaching & applied linguistics. London: Longman

Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversations. Oxford: Blackwell.

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (Eds.): Syntax and semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Politics, ideology and discourse. In R. Wodak, (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of language and linguistics.

Wodak, R. (2005). A new agenda in critical discourse analysis theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1902211A


  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)

ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)


University of Niš

Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia
Phone:    +381 18 257 095
Telefax:  +381 18 257 950

© 2013 by University of Niš, Serbia