Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Pre-Employment Tests: An Awareness Raising Exercise

Tharwat M. EL-Sakran

DOI Number
First page
Last page


In today’s world, jobs have become very competitive and demanding in terms of some companies’ requirements. It often happens that an unlimited number of individuals may apply for an announced vacancy. To screen and filter out the many interested applicants, a great number of companies no longer solely rely on a well designed CV, an appealing job application letter (JAL) and good performance in an interview. In addition to the above, many companies all over the world necessitate that prospective job applicants sit for personality attributes tests. Such tests supplement the initial assumptions made about the applicants’ capabilities through the CV, the JAL and the interview. This study reports on the use of one such tests in a professional communication skills course for engineering students at a private English-medium university in the United Arab Emirates, and how it is utilized to better prepare students for workplace requirements and enable them to negotiate test results and refer to them as evidence for possessing highly requisite personal attributes. Pre- and post- test survey results point to students’ gains in understanding test purposes and how these can be geared towards self-marketing.


professional communication skills, engineering students pre-employment tests, workplace requirements

Full Text:



Balderson, S. J. and Broderick, A. J. (1996). Behaviour in teams: exploring occupational and gender differences. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11(5), 33 – 42.

Belbin Associates, (2011). Method, Reliability & Validity, Statistics & Research: A Comprehensive Review of Belbin Team Roles. Retrieved from

Belbin Associates, (2015). Belbin Team Roles. Retrieved from

Bowen, D. (2013). On the Criticality of Communication and Team Skills for Modern Engineering Practice, In Agendas for 21st Century Engineers, (D. Prescott & C. Brandt, eds.), United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 85-103.

Crawford, M. (2012). Teaching teamwork to engineers. American Society of Mechanical

Engineers. Retrieved from

David, M. H., Ponnamperuma, G. G. & Ker, J. S. (2009). Student perceptions of a portfolio assessment process. Medical Education, 43, 89-98.

Di Milia, L. (2004). Australian management selection practices: Closing the gap between research findings and practice. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 42, 214–228.

Dulewicz, V. (1995). A validation of Belbin's team roles from 16PF and OPQ using bosses' ratings of competence, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68, 81-99

El-Sakran, T., Prescott, D. and Mesanovic, M. (2013). Contextualizing Teamwork in a Professional Communication Course for Engineering Students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29, 2, 439–449.

Gunn, C. (2010). Exploring MATESOL student ‘resistence’ to reflection. Language Teaching, 14, 2, 208-223.

König, C. J., Klehe, U.-C., Berchtold, M., & Kleinmann, M. (2010). Reasons for being selective when choosing personnel selection procedures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 17–27.

König, C. J., Merz, A. S. & Trauffer, N. (2012).What is in applicants’ minds when they fill out a personality test? Insights from a qualitative study. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(4), 442-452.

Prescott, D. L., El-Sakran, T., Al-Assaf, Y., Albasha, L. and Aloul, F. (2012). Teambuilding, Innovation and the Engineering Communication Interface. American Journal of Engineering Education, 3(1), pp. 1-12.

Scheja, M. (2006). Delayed understanding and staying in phase: Students’ perceptions of their study situation. Higher Education, 52, 421-445.

Srivastava, P. and Hopwood, N. (2009). A Practical Iterative Framework for Qualitative Data Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8(1), 76-84.

Thill, J. V. and Couttland, L. B. (2007). Excellence in Business Communication (7th ed.). Pearson Education LTD.

Zibarras, L. D., & Woods, S. A. (2010). A survey of UK selection practices across different organization sizes and industry sectors. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 499–511.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)

ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)


University of Niš

Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia
Phone:    +381 18 257 095
Telefax:  +381 18 257 950

© 2013 by University of Niš, Serbia