INFLUENCE OF TASK-TYPE AND PROFICIENCY ON COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES USED BY OMANI EFL LEARNERS

Asfiya Khan, Samia Naqvi, Priya Mathew

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP231011055K
First page
737
Last page
752

Abstract


Communication strategies (CSs), an important component of strategic competence in foreign language learning, are techniques used by language learners to overcome the gap between their knowledge of the language and what they intend to communicate. An in-depth investigation into the factors that affect strategy use has clear implications for foreign language learning and teaching.

This quantitative study examines the influence of proficiency and task-type on 27 CSs under three major strategy categories: Communication Flow Maintenance, Interactional, and Compensation.  Participants are Omani EFL learners (n = 32) in the General Foundation Program (GFP). Participants performed three oral communication tasks in pairs (proficiency based) which were audio-video recorded and transcribed. The strategies used by each participant were quantified on an oral CSs checklist based on established taxonomies.

 The findings highlight that the overall use of CSs was more for the high proficiency group compared to the low proficiency group. Further, task characteristics had an influence on the use of CSs. Both proficiency groups used CSs least in the picture story task, more in the abstract art description task, and most in the information-gap task. Proficiency driven differences were noted in the use of individual strategies under each category, across tasks. The findings of this study have implications for designing communicative tasks as a tool to encourage the use of a wide gamut of communication strategies. 


Keywords

communication strategies, communication flow maintenance strategies, compensation strategies; interactional strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abu Nawas, S. N. (2012). Communication strategies used by Jordanian EFL learners. Canadian Social Science 8, no. 4 (November): 178-193. http://www.cscanada.net/index.php/css/article/view/j.css.1923669720120804.1206

Al Alawi, R. A. (2016). Communication strategies used by Omani EFL learners. Pyrex Journal of English and Literature 2, no. 1 (January): 001-011. https://pyrexjournal.org

Al Hinai, I. A. S. (2018). They cannot Write as Well as We Expect’, Why? A Multi-Case Study of Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Factors that Hinder Graduates of Colleges of Technology Mastering Technical Writing Skills Requested in the Omani Market. https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/34542

Al-Hosni, S. (2014). Speaking difficulties encountered by young EFL learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL) 2, no. 6 (June): 22-30. https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijsell/v2-i6/4.pdf

Al-Humaidi, S. H. (2002). Communication strategies in oral discourse by Omani EFL students and their teachers: An interactional perspective. Phd Thesis. Indiana University, United States.

Al Riyami, T. K. (2021). Omani graduates’ English communication skills: employers’ perspectives Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives 17, no.2: 136-149. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/LTHE-01-2021-0007/full/pdf?title=omani-graduates-english-communication-skills-employers-perspectives

Bialystok, E. (1983). Some factors in the selection and implementation of communication strategies. In C. Færch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 100-118). Harlow, England: Longman.

Bialystok, E. (1990). Communication strategies: A psychological analysis of second language use. USA: Blackwell Publishers.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1:1-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1

Chen, S. Q. (1990). A study of communication strategies in interlanguage production by

Chinese EFL learners. Language Learning. 40 (2), 155-187. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ411869

Dörnyei, Z. & Kormos, J. (1998). Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication: A psycholinguistic perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, no.3: 349-385. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44485756

Dörnyei, Z. & Scott, M. L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning 47, no.1: 173-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.51997005

Færch, C. & Kasper, G. (1983). Strategies in interlanguage communication. London: Longman.

Hua, T. K., Nor, N. F. M., & Jaradat, M. N. (2012). Communication strategies among EFL students: An examination of frequency of use and types of strategies used. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 12, no. 3: 831-848. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11494415.pdf

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. Pride & J. Holmes (eds), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings, 269-93. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Kaivanpanah, S., Yamouty, P., &Karami, H. (2012). Examining the effects of proficiency, gender, and task type on the use of communication strategies. Porta Linguarum 17 (January): 79-93.http://doi.10.30827/Digibug.31960

Khan, A., & Al-Mahrooqi, R. (2015). Foreign language communication anxiety (FLCA) among tertiary level Omani EFL learners. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly 17, no.1: 57-89. https://www.elejournals.com/asian-efl-journal/the-asian-efl-journal-quarterly-march-2015/

Khan, S. (2010). Strategies and spoken production on three oral communication tasks: A study of high and low proficiency EFL learners. Phd Thesis. University of Barcelona, Barcelona. https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/32083/sk1de1.pdf

Li, R. L. (2010). The relationship between speaking anxiety and speaking strategies among university students in Taiwan. Phd Thesis. National Ping Tong University of Education, Ping Tong, Taiwan.

Liskin-Gasparro, J. E. (1996). Circumlocution, communication strategies, and the ACTFL proficiency guidelines: An analysis of student discourse. Foreign Language Annals 29, no.3: 317-330. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ532604

Mathew, P. (2021). Phraseology in two Omani undergraduate Civil Engineering genres: The N of (the) N pattern. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics 11, no. 2 (September): 427-439. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i2.34182

Mei, A., & Nathalang, S. (2010). Use of communication strategies by Chinese EFL learners. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 33, no. 3: 110-125. https://www.semanticscholar.

org/paper/Use-of-Communication-Strategies

Mishra, S. K. & Mishra, P. (2020). Functional aspects of communication skills for professional empowerment. Journal of English Language and Literature (JOELL) 7, no.1: 79-85. https://joell.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/79-85-COMMUNICATION-SKILLS-FOR-PROFESSIONAL-EMPOWERMENT.pdf

Nakatani, Y. (2006). Developing an oral communication strategy inventory. The Modern Language Journal 90, no. 2: 151-168. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00390.x

Nguyen, T. T. H., Vu, V. P., & Do, T. T. Y. (2022). The influences of oral communication strategies on students’ English speaking proficiency. Can Tho University Journal of Science 14, no. 2: 8-17. https://doi.org/10.22144/ctu.jen.2022.012

Paribakht, T. (1985). Strategic competence and language proficiency. Applied Linguistic 6, no.2 (January): 132-146. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.2.132

Poulisse, N. (1993). A theoretical account of lexical communication strategies. In R.

Schreuder & B. Weltens (Eds.), The bilingual lexicon (pp. 157-189). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Rababah, G. (2002). Strategic competence and language teaching, language and linguistics. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED472697.pdf

Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreigner talk, and repair in interlanguage. Language Learning 30, no.4: 17-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00326.x

Ting, S. H., Soekarno,M., & Lee, P. Y. (2017). Communication strategy use and proficiency level of EFL learners. The Journal of ASIA TEFL 14, no. 1 (Spring 2017): 162-170.http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2017.14.1.11.162

Ugla, R.L., Adnan, N.I &Abdin, M.J.(2013). Study of communication strategies used by Iraqi EFL students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education 2, no.1: 44-50.

Khanji, R. (1993). Interlanguage talk: The relation between task types and communication strategies among EFL Arab learners. In J.E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown university routable on language and linguistics. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.

Poulisse, N., & Schils, E. (1989). The influence of task-and proficiency- related factors on the use of compensatory strategies: A quantitative analysis. Language Learning. 39 (1), 15-48.

Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287-318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tuan, H.J. (2001). Is extroversion-introversion tendency a variable in the choice of strategies in communication? Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 306-324). Taipei: Crane.

Uztosun, M.S. & Erten,I.H.(2014).The impact of English proficiency on the use of communication strategies: An interaction-based study in Turkish EFL context. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 10, no. 2: 169-182. http://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/292

Yakut, I., & Bada, E. (2022). Interlanguage development of Turkish speakers of English: Exploring oral and written communication strategies. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 611-626. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2104611Y




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP231011055K

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)