DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING IN READING COMPREHENSION OF TEXTS FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES AT ALL LEVELS OF BLOOM'S TAXONOMY

Božena Horváthová, Lýdia Naďová

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2101001H
First page
001
Last page
016

Abstract


This study tackles the role of the ESP teacher, course design, teaching techniques, and evaluation procedures. It further focuses on evaluating teaching techniques which should improve student reading comprehension, which operates at multiple levels, by applying Bloom’s six levels to in-class reading tasks. To accomplish this, twelve B2 level students engaged in activities that revolve around their reading of a text for specific purposes. Through these activities, teaching techniques were assessed and student comprehension was evaluated on each of the six levels. The activities used for research at level 1 were done in person in the classroom. The research activities for levels 2-6 were arranged through an eLearning platform, and students worked independently to complete them and return them to the teacher via the Internet. The research method used was action research. Based on the findings, it is aimed to offer answers and suggestions that may be useful for EAP and ESP teachers. The research has shown that using reading comprehension strategies at all levels of Bloom’s taxonomy in achieving comprehension is beneficial not only in language education, but also for development of the higher order thinking skills of adolescents. It equips them with the ability to think critically and creatively, and provides them with vital tools that they will use during their whole life.

Keywords

English for specific purposes, reading comprehension, Bloom’s taxonomy, critical thinking

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson W. and Krathwohl, D. R. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment. A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. USA : Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of References for languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. [ed.] Cambridge University Press. Strasbourg : Language Policy Unit.

Duke, K. Nell. 2003. Comprehension instruction for informational text. What Research Says About Reading. 61(6), 40-44.

Fastiggi, W. 2014. Applying Bloom’s Taxonomy to the Classroom. [Online] 2014. [Accessed on 05. 03 2020.] Retrieved from https://technologyforlearners.com/ applying-blooms-taxonomy-to-the-classroom.

Gershon, M. 2013. How to use Bloom’s Taxonomy in the classroom. [ed.] TES Connect Digital Publishing.

Keenan, M. J., Betjemann, R. S. and Olson, R.K. 2008. Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. [ed.] Psychology Department. Scientific Studies of Reading. 3, 12(3), 281-300.

Kováčiková, E. 2020. English for Specific Purposes in Higher Education through Content and Language Integrated Learning.

Newcastle UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Krathwohl, R. D. 2002. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. THEORY INTO PRACTICE. 41 (4).

Küçükoğlu, H. 2013. Improving reading skills through effective reading strategies. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. (70), 709-714.

Latief, M. A. 2012. Research method on language learning: Introduction. Malang: UM Press.

Lewis, C.S. 1960. Essay on Forgiveness. Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc. N.Y.

Ornstein, A. 1990. Strategies for Effective Teaching – T. F. Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and Performance Tasks Wheel. New York : HarperCollins Publishers.

Park, Y.-H. 2010. Korean EFL College Students’ Reading Strategy Use to Comprehend Authentic Expository/Technical Texts in English. [dissertation] University of Kansas.

Persaud, Ch. 2018. Bloom’s Taxonomy: The Ultimate Guide. [Online] [Accessed on 25. 03 2020.] Retrieved from https://tophat.com/blog/blooms-taxonomy-ultimate-guide.

Robinson, P. 1980. ESP (English for Specific Purposes). Pergamon.

Scully, D. 2017. Constructing Multiple-Choice Items to Measure Higher-Order Thinking. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation (PARE), 22 (4).

Shabatura, J. 2018. Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Write Effective Learning Objectives. [Online]. [Accessed on 22. 03 2020.] Retrieved from: https://tips.uark.edu/using-blooms-taxonomy/. Best Practices, Course Design.

Snow, C. E. 2002. Reading for understanding: toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA : RAND.

Strevens, P. 1988. ESP after twenty-years: A re-appraisal. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), ESP: State of the art (pp. 1-13). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

Surjosuseno, T. T. and Watts, V. 1999. Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to teach reading in English as a foreign language classes. Queensland Journal of Educational Research (QJER), 15(2), 227-244.

The collaboration of English Councils. 2013-2014. Teachers’ Guide to Reading Comprehension Strategies P5-S3 : Edinburgh Literacy Hub.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2101001H

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)