PRINCIPLED PRAGMATISM AND EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING: TWO FACETS OF CONSTRUCTIVISM IN ESP

Oleg B. Tarnopolsky, Svitlana P. Kozhushko

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2002123T
First page
123
Last page
133

Abstract


The article discusses two approaches that are considered to be the most promising ones in today’s teaching of English for Specific Purposes (ESP). The two approaches in question are Kumaravadivelu’s principled pragmatic approach and the experiential learning approach. It is shown that they both help to unify into one single new paradigm the three leading paradigms in modern ESP teaching: content-based instruction, English immersion, and culture-specific target language learning. After defining each of the two approaches in ESP courses at tertiary schools, the paper proceeds to prove the authors’ leading idea that both principled pragmatism and experiential learning are a perfect match embodying two facets of a broader pedagogical approach that is applicable not only when teaching ESP (and teaching foreign languages in general) but also when teaching other disciplines, especially at the tertiary school level. This broader pedagogical approach is constructivism, which provides students with opportunities for ‘constructing’ their own knowledge and skills through practical experience in real-life or modeled activities. In this case, students acquire their knowledge and skills (including skills of communicating in the target language) as a by-product of their real-life or modeled activities, thus internalizing (appropriating) the knowledge and skills and not just learning them. The peculiarities of constructivism in ESP courses are discussed, and the guidelines are given for the practical implementation of the principled pragmatic approach through experiential learning activities in the framework of the fully constructivist ESP course (in what concerns its theoretical and methodological foundations).


Keywords

tertiary professional education, paradigms in ESP teaching and learning, principled pragmatic approach, experiential learning approach, constructivism in language teaching, content-based instruction, English immersion, culture-specific target language lea

Full Text:

PDF

References


Benson, P, & Voller, P. (Eds). (1997). Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning.London and New York: Longman.

Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller.

Brinton, D.M., Snow, M.A., & Wesche, M.B. (1989). Content-Based Second Language Instruction. New York: Newbury House Publishers.

Burkert, A., Mumford, S., & Lackman, K. (2010). Symposium on grammar teaching in the post-communicative era. In Briony Beaven (Ed.) IATEFL 2009 Cardiff Conference Selections (pp. 98-100). Canterbury, Kent: IATEFL.

Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching and Assessment. Strasbourg.

Dam, L. (2002). Plenary: Developing learner autonomy – preparing learners for lifelong learning. In A. Pulverness (Ed.). IATEFL 2002. York Conference Selections (pp. 41-52). Whitstable, Kent: IATEFL.

Ferradas, C.M. (2010). Plenary: Outside looking in: intercultural and intermedial encounters in ELT. In Briony Beaven (Ed.) IATEFL 2009 Cardiff Conference Selections (pp. 16-20). Canterbury, Kent: IATEFL.

Fotos, S.S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28 (2), 323-351.

Glaserfeld, E. von. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In L.P. Steffe, J. Gale (Eds.). Constructivism in Education (pp. 3-16). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Johnson, R.K., Swain, M. (1997). Immersion Education: International Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kessler, C. (Ed.). (1992). Cooperative Language Learning: A Teacher's Resource Book. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice Hall Regents.

Kohonen, V., Jaatinen, R., Kaikkonen, P., Lehtovaara J. (2014). Experiential Learning in Foreign Language Education. New York: Routledge.

Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Krashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35 (No.4), 537-560.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies in Language Teaching. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record,105 (9), 1623-1640.

Robinson, P.C. (1991). ESP Today: A Practitioner's Guide. Hamel, Hempstead: Prentice Hall.

Rogers, C.R. (1983). Freedom to Learn for the 80s. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

Rutherford, W.E. (1987). Second Language Grammar. Learning and Teaching. London and New York: Longman.

Stoller, F.L. (2007). Content-based instruction. In Nelleke van Deusen-Scholl and Nancy H. Hornberger (Eds). Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Vol.4: Second and Foreign Language Education (pp. 59-70). New York, NY: Springer.

Tarnopolsky, O.B., Momot, V.E., Kozhushko, S.P., et al. (2008). Metodika anglojazychnogo pogruzhenija v obuchenii anglijskomu jazyku I special'nym disciplinam studentov jekonomicheskih vuzov (Method of English Immersion in Teaching English and Professional Subjects to Tertiary Students of Economics). Collective monograph under the general supervision and editorship of O.B. Tarnopolskyy, V.E. Momot, and S.P. Kozhushko. Dnepropetrovsk: DUEL (the original is in Russian).

Tarnopolsky, O. (2011). Experiential B.E. teaching/learning: A happy combination of Intercultural and communicative approaches. Business Issues, Issue 78, 7-8.

Tarnopolsky, O.B., Kozhushko, S.P., Degtiaryova U.V., et al. (2011). Metody`ka navchannya anglijs`koyi movy` studentiv-psy`xologiv: monografiya (Methods of Teaching English to Students of Psychology: A Monograph). General and scholarly editor O.B. Tarnopolsky. Dnipropetrovsk: Alfred Nobel University (the original is in Ukrainian).

Tarnopolsky, O. (2012). Constructivist Blended Learning Approach to Teaching English for Specific Purposes. London: Versita.

Tarnopolsky, O. (2018). Principled pragmatism, or well-grounded eclecticism: A new paradigm in teaching English as a foreign language at Ukrainian tertiary schools? Advanced Education, 10, 5-11.

White, R., Arndt, V. (1991). Process Writing. Harlow: Longman.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2002123T

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2334-9182 (Print)
ISSN 2334-9212 (Online)